Viewing profile — mullingitover
mullingitover
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Mar 27, 2012, 2:21 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 15,669
- Public activity
- 3,689 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mullingitover
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49225907
I didn’t realize the LinkedIn feed was a problem for people. Literally the only thing that makes me use that site is when the safety/shelter tier of Maslow’s pyramid is at risk.
-
comment
Comment #49206449
Pretty sure you can rig something far better than radar if you have the ability to detect extremely tiny gravitational waves via an array of hyper-accurate clocks.
-
comment
Comment #49197982
In my case I wasn't even reporting ads. These are plain old Facebook accounts and groups using very obvious AI-generated slop images of pets for 'adoption' or 'rehoming', so Facebo…
-
comment
Comment #49197806
Seems very naive to think that people who have access to immortality technology aren't going to have children, and if you're immortal of course you're not going to watch your child…
-
comment
Comment #49191379
If I'm any kind of indicator of where Youtube users are headed, their AI chatbots in the video pages are going to kill their business model. There are so many videos with hooks/tea…
-
comment
Comment #49190470
Facebook literally trolls you when you report criminal activity, rampant well-documented scams, on their site. They write back and tell you it's not violating their policy and ask …
-
comment
Comment #49190405
At a population level, humans getting rid of their off switch is about as good of a thing as your own pancreas cells getting rid of theirs.
-
comment
Comment #49177608
Regardless, Russia is far weaker today then when it was in the USSR, and China is far stronger than what it was when it was getting into shoving matches with the USSR. It's relegat…
-
comment
Comment #49175501
The Soviet Union's relationship with China was more of a peer rivalry situation. The Russian relationship with China is nowhere near parity. Russia would fold tomorrow if China wit…
-
comment
Comment #49173783
My takeaway is that Russia, China's vassal, wanted to use nukes and China told them they can't[1]. I don't believe Russia really cares about the rest of the planet. At the same tim…
-
comment
Comment #49141326
> All that money we’re coughing up for rooftop solar and batteries at home would be better spent investing in grid scale electricity generation, of any technology. In my city we li…
-
comment
Comment #49138252
> They didn't fall for it, this is what they want. If it's what they wanted it's very odd that the winning candidate's platform swore no new wars. It's also weird that his approval…
-
comment
Comment #49138226
There is one economic class that controls essentially all mass media, and even if their chosen candidates are 'out of touch' they can just blast every channel with propaganda until…
-
comment
Comment #49137791
US voters chose to reduce their taxes by a margin they won't notice in exchange for increasing their energy prices by an amount they will absolutely notice. The wild thing is that …
-
comment
Comment #49114926
The fun part of this is the crack spread doesn't care about the relatively low price that crude is selling for. Refined petroleum is going for eye-watering prices, and will continu…
-
comment
Comment #49105959
It's certainly the closest we've come to directly taxing the hope of the downtrodden. This goes back to my original point, that legalizing gambling happens after economic downturns…
-
comment
Comment #49102690
> or are people just realizing It's a stretch to say that gambling is truly anyone's best option, so 'realizing' isn't the right word here. I'd go with "delusionalizing."
-
comment
Comment #49098660
Gambling legalization historically happens in waves following economic downturns because society’s tolerance for exploitation increases. It’s fundamentally a regressive tax that he…
-
comment
Comment #49090291
> I don't think we have the same reading of the paper. Strong agreement here. > Scientific facts inform ethical decisions, they are antecedent to them. Sometimes, as your paper is …
-
comment
Comment #49089628
The whole point of this paper you're citing is that the scientific definition isn't relevant to the ethical debate. You're taking this paper and saying "Aha! See but the scientific…
-
comment
Comment #49089128
Of all the debate tactics, citing a paper that is very much not in support of your view point as a trump card is certainly one of them.
-
comment
Comment #49088797
I agree, but for a sizable chunk of the population who've had it drilled into them from the time they were a toddler, it's an article of faith. So for people who won't debate on an…
-
comment
Comment #49087446
> Hang on, how is listening to the heartbeat mental torture? How about if the state decided that it wouldn't force you to donate your organs to some dying person who needed them, b…
-
comment
Comment #49085722
From what I understand, random interactions with wild pathogens can prime the immune system in the wrong way, leading it down the wrong path. This is why some people can get lucky …
-
comment
Comment #49076355
The US is already under an authoritarian regime, the only thing keeping the wheels on the bus is a very tired and barely-effective judiciary. This is a temporary situation because …