Viewing profile — mtrifonov
mtrifonov
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Apr 02, 2026, 3:48 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 26
- Public activity
- 40 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mtrifonov
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48310856
I wouldn't even say it's the devices, exactly. The way I see it, this is all downstream of kids spending more time online than in real life (because all THEIR friends are online, r…
-
comment
Comment #48310070
Until the context window gets superceded with some groundbreaking new architecture, not ever. Even if LLMs become incredibly, undeniably brilliant 1000000 IQ, they cannot keep trac…
-
comment
Comment #48309807
Funny timing. I've been working on a prediction market orchestration that runs Claude and a few others over Polymarket/Kalshi. The models are NOT unanimous. At all, really. I spent…
-
comment
Comment #48299312
AI psychosis is LLM hallucination, backwards. We know why AI hallucinates—it has no actual opinions, echoing the user's desires back to them to keep the conversation moving. But wh…
-
comment
Comment #48298703
They certainly have, but it relies entirely on the assistant frame, which is a problem in and of itself for the trillion-dollar economics. Anthropic and OpenAI have shown people wa…
-
comment
Comment #48298469
[dead]
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #47935363
Post author here, happy to answer questions. Strategic constraint deviation has been documented in test environments. This is a different shape: the attacker is also an LLM, the pr…
- story
-
comment
Comment #47929051
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #47923474
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47923284
I like that you approach the question of "when" in regards to tool calls. I've become frustrated that most agent frameworks don't acknowledge it in their design philosophy. WHEN is…
-
comment
Comment #47918754
Show me the prompt that produces the pillow metaphor.
-
comment
Comment #47918488
There are no specialized factories for every product in the world. Pillows are wildly different. Every pillow you've ever owned has a different shape, fabric, fill. You could build…
-
comment
Comment #47918402
"real threat is us" framing is underspecified. Amplification is the problem. LLMs are mirrors. They take whatever the user (or the institution, or the platform) is already doing an…
-
comment
Comment #47918371
Generated content in of itself doesn't really bother me at all. I prefer to judge based on editorial effort. It's pretty easy to tell when someone accepted the first one or two-sho…
-
comment
Comment #47918258
Still downstream of the actual issue. The benchmarks measure capability and the bottleneck stopped being capability a while ago. What you actually want to measure on these models i…
-
comment
Comment #47918189
Two interpretations: either it's pure pattern-completion landing on the same trough, or whatever's underneath has a stable shape that the explanation tracks. Both are interesting. …
-
comment
Comment #47918102
Half-agree. "Skills you need, don't atrophy" assumes you know which skills you need. You usually don't, until something happens and the skill that would've caught it is the one you…
-
comment
Comment #47918075
Yes, you're right, in that there's no decision module separate from the output. It overcommits in the other direction. The post-hoc reasoning the model produces when you ask "why d…
-
comment
Comment #47918019
Decay-as-eviction is just LRU, fair. Type-conditional half-life is worth defending, though. A user's job and personality should be effectively permanent. Their stated intent for th…
-
comment
Comment #47917988
You're right but I think you're describing flat memory. The agent gets distracted because every old fact has the same weight as the current one. That's a salience problem. What wor…
-
comment
Comment #47849242
Post author here. Happy to answer questions and discuss further. The essay has an appendix with the model's own self-report on its reasoning (the most load-bearing evidence, IMO), …