Viewing profile — mthiim
mthiim
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Oct 23, 2023, 6:33 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 49
- Public activity
- 12 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mthiim
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #43802232
Seems quite advanced for a '88 educational toy. For comparison, I got a VTech SmartStart for xmas in the early '90s and it had just a short 14-segment display line and could mainly…
-
comment
Comment #43662735
I imagine G.H. Hardy might be like: e is the unique base of a logarithm function, ln(n), so so that the average distance between prime numbers less than n, converges proportionally…
-
comment
Comment #43659116
To me it was only when we got to radioactive decay in physics it clicked to me why the particular "e" was special and useful. Background: exp(x) was introduced as the inverse to lo…
-
comment
Comment #38000991
Thanks a lot! :)
-
comment
Comment #37997130
This conversion O(2^n) -> O(2^n/2) only applies to Grover's algorithm which can be used to break symmetric crypto (AES etc.). This is not the usual concern in the context of quantu…
-
comment
Comment #37997072
Yes absolutely: If both security elements fail (quantum computers that break classical crypto appear, and the supposed post-quantum element turns out to be insecure as well) then y…
-
comment
Comment #37990501
Agreed. While manufacturers do show an impressive increase in the number of noisy qubits, we still have yet to see a demonstration of quantum error correction at anywhere near the …
-
comment
Comment #37990478
Many-worlds etc. does not have such a limit. There are interpretations that posit that collapse is triggered by the system reaching a certain size (also GRW theory etc.). Such inte…
-
comment
Comment #37990439
True - on the other hand, that fear/principle could be applied to all algorithms that could theoretically be broke in the future. There's a lot of uncertainty concerning the scalab…
-
comment
Comment #37990295
I'm not aware of any production-grade libs of these algorithms, but they might exist. While NIST did pick Dilthium as among the winners in summer 2022, it still hasn't been fully s…
-
comment
Comment #37989953
That algorithm was never chosen as a final candidate, unlike Dilithium and Kyber. Nevertheless, it remains intriguing because it advanced significantly in the competition until thi…
-
comment
Comment #37989764
Hello everyone! I'm thrilled to see my project trending here on Hacker News. It's a pure toy implementation inspired by the paper and its reference. While it aligns with all the pr…