Viewing profile — mswphd
mswphd
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Apr 07, 2026, 1:57 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 288
- Public activity
- 159 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mswphd
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48999959
it doesn't overturn much. For example, here is a post from 2004 https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=105 it is about a purported (though incorrect) positive proof of th…
-
comment
Comment #48985798
verification also requires computing the jacobian. an undergraduate-level exercise, but harder than verifying p(pt1) == p(pt2).
-
comment
Comment #48953745
this is only true in the IND-CPA model for most "practical" FHE work. So a more precise way to describe things is "a server who faithfully performs the task given to them does not …
-
comment
Comment #48893780
https://paseo.sh/ supports self-hosting, though I've only used it a mild amount tbh.
-
comment
Comment #48884594
I don't think quibbling over "equivalence" vs "equality" is useful personally. They're both "equality". Just what the sign "=" means differs depending on the type information. E.g …
-
comment
Comment #48837587
there's been some forward movement on doing this via an appropriate intrinsic in LLVM https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/166702 note that this isn't the only "trick" needed …
-
comment
Comment #48832551
that has some technical limitations. For example, their impl can compile to wasm, which makes giving an online interpreter simpler/lighter weight than relying on running python in …
-
comment
Comment #48832517
note that similar concepts appear in mathematics. Generally the term for it is a "mollified" function. applied to the step function, you would get a smooth cutoff function https://…
-
comment
Comment #48824960
as a heads up, there is another attack paper against McEliece today https://eprint.iacr.org/2026/1339 Note that this is by someone from the BSI. It's worth mentioning the BSI is ve…
-
comment
Comment #48821147
you'd probably call it "Product NTRU" then, and be a minimum a decade out of date. So you'd probably have to do all that weird shit with co-different ideals Peikert was trying to g…
-
comment
Comment #48821124
huh. I really wouldn't want the Nobel Prize committee in medicine doing cryptographic work then. good thing your comment has nothing to do with cryptography then :)
-
comment
Comment #48821094
it's worth clarifying that its entrants were all qualified, and 2 other essentially identical schemes, namely New Hope and Saber, made it very deep into the NIST competition. All 3…
-
comment
Comment #48821030
It really depends on what the precise details of the attack look like. 1. algebraic structure: sure use frodoKEM 2. error rates smaller than those required for worst-case to averag…
-
comment
Comment #48820825
that's really not possible for ML-KEM. They took a well-known "boring" design, and tweaked certain internal sub-components of it. Their tweaks were good, and their analysis/exposit…
-
comment
Comment #48820737
the NSA also recommends elliptic curve cryptography, and designed SHA2 themselves. if you want we can talk through how to disable all of these ciphersuites, so you can be stuck wit…
-
comment
Comment #48820720
as mentioned it's complicated, but the general trend of the NSA pushing cryptography they can break and others can't is well-known. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NOBUS note that th…
-
comment
Comment #48820671
1. Kyberslash is mostly marketing. Some implementations (including the Kyber reference implementation, but *not* including the Kyber AVX implementation) had a non-constant time com…
-
comment
Comment #48820444
there is no indication there are similar papers. Curiously, the best lattice cryptanalysts in the world are chinese and european (here I'm thinking of people like Ducas, Albrecht, …
-
comment
Comment #48819356
this is not what I said before. As I mentioned in the post you replied to, there are certain scenarios (e.g. hardware) where pure ML-KEM has significant performance benefits. It in…
-
comment
Comment #48819022
if you blindly distrust the NSA, you should stop using x25519 immediately. It uses SHA2, which was solely developed by the NSA. If DJB blindly distrusts the NSA, he would also reco…
-
comment
Comment #48818978
you would make poor decisions then. McEliece recently (in the last month) had a large new attack against it https://eprint.iacr.org/2026/1232 This doesn't hit classic McEliece yet,…
-
comment
Comment #48818923
this is entirely wrong. Lattice-based cryptography has been extremely well-studied theoretically and practically, even before standardization. For example, a (hybrid) lattice-based…
-
comment
Comment #48818780
NTRU based schemes are not the most conservative. NTRU is an old design from the 90s, that had some shocking structural attacks against it appear ~2016. These attacks so far are on…
-
comment
Comment #48818559
using pure ML-KEM is not a footgun. Some people may have doubts about lattice-based cryptography, despite being securely deployed in Chrome nearly a decade ago. Some people have do…
-
comment
Comment #48818540
note that this says something more limited than what you're saying. Specifically, an american company was not allowed to give access to the cryptography you describe to non-America…