Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — mswphd

mswphd

HN member
Joined
Tue, Apr 07, 2026, 1:57 AM UTC
HN karma
288
Public activity
159 items

About mswphd

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48999959

    it doesn't overturn much. For example, here is a post from 2004 https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=105 it is about a purported (though incorrect) positive proof of th…

  2. comment
    Comment #48985798

    verification also requires computing the jacobian. an undergraduate-level exercise, but harder than verifying p(pt1) == p(pt2).

  3. comment
    Comment #48953745

    this is only true in the IND-CPA model for most "practical" FHE work. So a more precise way to describe things is "a server who faithfully performs the task given to them does not …

  4. comment
    Comment #48893780

    https://paseo.sh/ supports self-hosting, though I've only used it a mild amount tbh.

  5. comment
    Comment #48884594

    I don't think quibbling over "equivalence" vs "equality" is useful personally. They're both "equality". Just what the sign "=" means differs depending on the type information. E.g …

  6. comment
    Comment #48837587

    there's been some forward movement on doing this via an appropriate intrinsic in LLVM https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/166702 note that this isn't the only "trick" needed …

  7. comment
    Comment #48832551

    that has some technical limitations. For example, their impl can compile to wasm, which makes giving an online interpreter simpler/lighter weight than relying on running python in …

  8. comment
    Comment #48832517

    note that similar concepts appear in mathematics. Generally the term for it is a "mollified" function. applied to the step function, you would get a smooth cutoff function https://…

  9. comment
    Comment #48824960

    as a heads up, there is another attack paper against McEliece today https://eprint.iacr.org/2026/1339 Note that this is by someone from the BSI. It's worth mentioning the BSI is ve…

  10. comment
    Comment #48821147

    you'd probably call it "Product NTRU" then, and be a minimum a decade out of date. So you'd probably have to do all that weird shit with co-different ideals Peikert was trying to g…

  11. comment
    Comment #48821124

    huh. I really wouldn't want the Nobel Prize committee in medicine doing cryptographic work then. good thing your comment has nothing to do with cryptography then :)

  12. comment
    Comment #48821094

    it's worth clarifying that its entrants were all qualified, and 2 other essentially identical schemes, namely New Hope and Saber, made it very deep into the NIST competition. All 3…

  13. comment
    Comment #48821030

    It really depends on what the precise details of the attack look like. 1. algebraic structure: sure use frodoKEM 2. error rates smaller than those required for worst-case to averag…

  14. comment
    Comment #48820825

    that's really not possible for ML-KEM. They took a well-known "boring" design, and tweaked certain internal sub-components of it. Their tweaks were good, and their analysis/exposit…

  15. comment
    Comment #48820737

    the NSA also recommends elliptic curve cryptography, and designed SHA2 themselves. if you want we can talk through how to disable all of these ciphersuites, so you can be stuck wit…

  16. comment
    Comment #48820720

    as mentioned it's complicated, but the general trend of the NSA pushing cryptography they can break and others can't is well-known. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NOBUS note that th…

  17. comment
    Comment #48820671

    1. Kyberslash is mostly marketing. Some implementations (including the Kyber reference implementation, but *not* including the Kyber AVX implementation) had a non-constant time com…

  18. comment
    Comment #48820444

    there is no indication there are similar papers. Curiously, the best lattice cryptanalysts in the world are chinese and european (here I'm thinking of people like Ducas, Albrecht, …

  19. comment
    Comment #48819356

    this is not what I said before. As I mentioned in the post you replied to, there are certain scenarios (e.g. hardware) where pure ML-KEM has significant performance benefits. It in…

  20. comment
    Comment #48819022

    if you blindly distrust the NSA, you should stop using x25519 immediately. It uses SHA2, which was solely developed by the NSA. If DJB blindly distrusts the NSA, he would also reco…

  21. comment
    Comment #48818978

    you would make poor decisions then. McEliece recently (in the last month) had a large new attack against it https://eprint.iacr.org/2026/1232 This doesn't hit classic McEliece yet,…

  22. comment
    Comment #48818923

    this is entirely wrong. Lattice-based cryptography has been extremely well-studied theoretically and practically, even before standardization. For example, a (hybrid) lattice-based…

  23. comment
    Comment #48818780

    NTRU based schemes are not the most conservative. NTRU is an old design from the 90s, that had some shocking structural attacks against it appear ~2016. These attacks so far are on…

  24. comment
    Comment #48818559

    using pure ML-KEM is not a footgun. Some people may have doubts about lattice-based cryptography, despite being securely deployed in Chrome nearly a decade ago. Some people have do…

  25. comment
    Comment #48818540

    note that this says something more limited than what you're saying. Specifically, an american company was not allowed to give access to the cryptography you describe to non-America…