Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — msuster

msuster

HN member
Joined
Fri, Jul 03, 2009, 2:59 PM UTC
HN karma
220
Public activity
80 items

About msuster

I am a 2x entrepreneur who has gone to the Dark Side of VC. I started my first company in 1999 and was headquartered in London. I left this company in 2005 and sold it to a publicly traded French services company. I founded my second company in Palo Alto in 2005 and sold this company to Salesforce.com where I became VP Product Management. This company now forms what is known as Salesforce Content. I joined GRP Partners in 2007 as a General Partner. I focus on early-stage technology companies – usually looking at Series A investments.

To follow me on Twitter: www.twitter.com/msuster

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #8336643

    This is mark (the author). I totally get why i would be seen as biased. I have given this advice hundreds of times in small sessions verbally and I REALLY have no interest in drivi…

  2. story
  3. comment
    Comment #5195147

    "massive boondoggle" because you were there and know what my business there was? I was there meeting tech professionals, VCs, government officials and investors in VC funds.

  4. comment
    Comment #5195130

    I went to China to meet with tech firms, VCs and government officials. And to learn about the funding environment for Chinese firms investing in VCs. I know that Dave also met with…

  5. comment
    Comment #4804685

    I read your response, David. Frankly, I think you do many entrepreneurs an injustice in assuming that I'm talking about VC funded entrepreneurs only. At my talk at University of Ch…

  6. comment
    Comment #4485900

    Not true. The full ratchet is implicit in the deal. If the deal said $8m cap and next investor invests at $4m then the deal gets done as $4m and doesn't impact the next investor. I…

  7. comment
    Comment #3842361

    I didn't miss that point. I agree with what you say. But - there are very few companies that could pull this off so my post was to point this out to people. It may be obvious to yo…

  8. comment
    Comment #3663053

    that is EXACTLY what happened in the situation I described. We hadn't yet signed the term sheet. So I told the CEO that I would understand if he went with the other firm. But that …

  9. comment
    Comment #3663044

    My term sheet wasn't signed so I would have understood if the entrepreneur chose the other partner. In the case of the new vc / old vc example that wasn't me ... yes, there was a '…

  10. comment
    Comment #3663022

    term sheets have "no shop" clauses which prohibit you from talking with other investors. But they're pretty unenforceable so it happens anyways.

  11. comment
    Comment #3661684

    I definitely have never argued that all VCs are good or even that good VCs always act appropriately. That's for sure. I think the key is knowing the parties with whom you're dealin…

  12. comment
    Comment #3661682

    I think the "new VC" acted terribly.

  13. comment
    Comment #3661675

    Thank you. I wish more people saw it that way. I always believe in negotiating / seeking competitive deals. But once you agree a deal with people you honor it.

  14. comment
    Comment #3661674

    Nope. I was an entrepreneur for 10 years first. I always employed this mentality. Reputation matters.

  15. comment
    Comment #3661668

    Fair comment. I could see why it might come across that way. The impression I meant to leave was that I risked losing out on the deal all together because the CEO could have simply…

  16. comment
    Comment #3661665

    I understand that view. And I've certainly been burned. Still, if you're dealing with a VC there is much you can do to reference check them before signing a term sheet. This involv…

  17. comment
    Comment #3595184

    Ok. Fair enough. Thanks for expanding. FWIW, in the busy execs hate lunches post - I was really just trying to offer honest advice to young entrepreneurs. I do lunches all the time…

  18. comment
    Comment #3582826

    And why is that, Michael? Which bits did you find objectionable? What would you prefer to hear? People negotiate. We can pretend they don't, but they do. For business people it's i…

  19. comment
    Comment #2609167

    As Woody Allen said, "80% of success is just showing up" but I didn't think that made a good line for a blog post ;-)

  20. comment
    Comment #2552659

    In 20 years of giving & receiving presentations I can tell you that this is actually the second most important advice I can give: if you can avoid handouts do so. (the most importa…

  21. comment
    Comment #2534459

    I spent 8 years in the trenches. If you want to argue with my position I'm open to a discussion. But merely saying people who don't agree with you are "primadonnas" is a bit superf…

  22. comment
    Comment #2534455

    re: "I'll risk a 50/50 gridlock in decision making over having someone tell me what to do everyday at "my" company any day." why not just make sure that you're the majority owner o…

  23. comment
    Comment #2238988

    I accept that this is possible. If I were Twitter in this case then at worst I would issue a public statement of why they don't support UberTwitter's moves and I would encourage us…

  24. comment
    Comment #2238987

    empowerment of people to socially engage & communicate is the basis on which all democracy is built. That is what is beautiful about Twitter. Shutting down competition or dissensio…

  25. comment
    Comment #2238984

    I'm not sure which bit was misinformed. If I learn that some bit was I will correct it. My premise holds: - issue a public warning to UberMedia & its users and allow 72 hours - if …