Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — mseepgood

mseepgood

HN member
Joined
Sat, Jun 02, 2012, 10:29 AM UTC
HN karma
3,796
Public activity
1,182 items

About mseepgood

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49143564

    It's not good Go code anyway. In Go you would use a for loop. Just because Go has generics nowadays doesn't mean you should abandon good taste and write ML/Haskell/Rust/C# in it.

  2. comment
    Comment #49131335

    Isn't that just how one falls asleep? I've been doing this every evening for decades.

  3. comment
    Comment #48613152

    Of all the messages they could have sent they chose the most boring.

  4. comment
    Comment #48038526

    He's probably dead by now.

  5. comment
    Comment #47995014

    > It seems to me that humans often fall into the trap of anthropomorphism. That's true, but they also often fall into the trap of exceptionalism.

  6. comment
    Comment #47498326

    This text lacks information about why it is being sunset.

  7. comment
    Comment #47291752

    A third that will never have a wife.

  8. comment
    Comment #47134334

    > We would immediately build better telescopes to track it precisely, refine its trajectory models, and begin developing propulsion systems capable of interception That's not what …

  9. comment
    Comment #47098568

    With a statically compiled language it is usually culled through dead-code elimination (DCE), and with static linking you don’t ship entire libraries.

  10. comment
    Comment #47008401

    The question is how many decades each user of your software would have to use it in order to offset, through the optimisation it provides, the energy consumption you burned through…

  11. comment
    Comment #46928891

    Our railways don't need sabotage - trains fail to run anyway.

  12. comment
    Comment #46158785

    So why do people still design declarative languages?

  13. comment
    Comment #45938631

    > Octals must start with zero and then o/O literals. No, the o/O is optional (hence in square brackets), only the leading zero is required. All of these are valid octal literals in…

  14. comment
    Comment #45938576

    You're looking at the wrong production. They are octal literals: octal_lit = "0" [ "o" | "O" ] [ "_" ] octal_digits .

  15. comment
    Comment #44982182

    The values for x and y should't come from your brain, though (with the exception of 0). They should come from previous index operations like s.indexOf(...) or s.search(regex), etc.…

  16. comment
    Comment #44633675

    Delegation is key

  17. comment
    Comment #44633661

    So he only did four hours of actual work per day.

  18. comment
    Comment #44414023

    Is it some kind of CORBA?

  19. comment
    Comment #44191974

    You don't even have to write proper sentences. "me get error X how fix here code:" usually works.

  20. comment
    Comment #44191920

    Is asking good questions or making clear requests what people now refer to as 'prompt engineering'?

  21. comment
  22. comment
    Comment #44175068

    The second most popular issue was adding generics. So it's probably not a resistance to change.

  23. comment
    Comment #44174706

    > sometimes a decision is better than nothing Not in this case. The most popular Go proposal/issue of all times was 'leave "if err != nil" alone': https://github.com/golang/go/issu…

  24. comment
    Comment #44173250

    It's good to have languages with different approaches to design and and with different design philosophies.

  25. comment
    Comment #44173173

    - It has poor visibility, it hides control flow branches in a single statement / expression. That's one of the reasons Go got rid of the ternary operator in favor of an if statemen…