Viewing profile — mseepgood
mseepgood
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jun 02, 2012, 10:29 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 3,796
- Public activity
- 1,182 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mseepgood
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49143564
It's not good Go code anyway. In Go you would use a for loop. Just because Go has generics nowadays doesn't mean you should abandon good taste and write ML/Haskell/Rust/C# in it.
-
comment
Comment #49131335
Isn't that just how one falls asleep? I've been doing this every evening for decades.
-
comment
Comment #48613152
Of all the messages they could have sent they chose the most boring.
-
comment
Comment #48038526
He's probably dead by now.
-
comment
Comment #47995014
> It seems to me that humans often fall into the trap of anthropomorphism. That's true, but they also often fall into the trap of exceptionalism.
-
comment
Comment #47498326
This text lacks information about why it is being sunset.
-
comment
Comment #47291752
A third that will never have a wife.
-
comment
Comment #47134334
> We would immediately build better telescopes to track it precisely, refine its trajectory models, and begin developing propulsion systems capable of interception That's not what …
-
comment
Comment #47098568
With a statically compiled language it is usually culled through dead-code elimination (DCE), and with static linking you don’t ship entire libraries.
-
comment
Comment #47008401
The question is how many decades each user of your software would have to use it in order to offset, through the optimisation it provides, the energy consumption you burned through…
-
comment
Comment #46928891
Our railways don't need sabotage - trains fail to run anyway.
-
comment
Comment #46158785
So why do people still design declarative languages?
-
comment
Comment #45938631
> Octals must start with zero and then o/O literals. No, the o/O is optional (hence in square brackets), only the leading zero is required. All of these are valid octal literals in…
-
comment
Comment #45938576
You're looking at the wrong production. They are octal literals: octal_lit = "0" [ "o" | "O" ] [ "_" ] octal_digits .
-
comment
Comment #44982182
The values for x and y should't come from your brain, though (with the exception of 0). They should come from previous index operations like s.indexOf(...) or s.search(regex), etc.…
-
comment
Comment #44633675
Delegation is key
-
comment
Comment #44633661
So he only did four hours of actual work per day.
-
comment
Comment #44414023
Is it some kind of CORBA?
-
comment
Comment #44191974
You don't even have to write proper sentences. "me get error X how fix here code:" usually works.
-
comment
Comment #44191920
Is asking good questions or making clear requests what people now refer to as 'prompt engineering'?
- comment
-
comment
Comment #44175068
The second most popular issue was adding generics. So it's probably not a resistance to change.
-
comment
Comment #44174706
> sometimes a decision is better than nothing Not in this case. The most popular Go proposal/issue of all times was 'leave "if err != nil" alone': https://github.com/golang/go/issu…
-
comment
Comment #44173250
It's good to have languages with different approaches to design and and with different design philosophies.
-
comment
Comment #44173173
- It has poor visibility, it hides control flow branches in a single statement / expression. That's one of the reasons Go got rid of the ternary operator in favor of an if statemen…