Viewing profile — mschuetz
mschuetz
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Sep 13, 2015, 1:07 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,438
- Public activity
- 474 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mschuetz
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49232961
What do you mean "why"? Setting up and tinkering with systems is work I loathe to do, obviously. I want to code, not host coding repositories. I did it in the past because I had to…
-
comment
Comment #49213037
But I don't want to have to do this kind of work, you're only listing disadvantages from my viewpoint.
-
comment
Comment #49213009
Well, yeah, I am. It's not something I want to have to care about. I want to code, not host code repos.
-
comment
Comment #49201137
Except anything I'd self host would be down much more often. I've hardly ever actually experienced down time issues with github when I needed it.
-
comment
Comment #49031155
I wouldnt recommend anyone going to Vulkan, though. It's pretty much the worst graphics API out there, and WebGPU is mimicking outdated Vulkan design decisions that even Vulkan is …
-
comment
Comment #49026637
WebGPU is newer, but lacks modern functionality because it was made to support ancient smartphones. That's great if you want to support ancient smartphones, but not if you want to …
-
comment
Comment #48910260
Of course it is a skill issue, I'm not afraid of admitting I'm not smart enough for Vulkan. That so many people have skill issues is the reason why Cuda trumps and will continue to…
-
comment
Comment #48909310
It absolutely isn't. After having spent 5 days not getting anything done in Vulkan, and being able to implement that same thing in a single day in Cuda (no prior experience in eith…
-
comment
Comment #48909245
On the contrary, it's great. Cuda is the single sane compute API and system, so I'll use it even if it means being vendor-locked. If my CUDA programs start running elsewhere withou…
-
comment
Comment #48905068
They really don't, no. Vulkan: 50 lines to allocate device memory. Cuda: One single line. What kind of extensive documentation stack do you want for functionality that is trivial i…
-
comment
Comment #48904544
A couple of years ago I evaluated both Vulkan and Cuda as a choice for future projects. I couldnt get anything done after a week in Vulkan, but had the test prototype project worki…
-
comment
Comment #48904524
> Ease of programming and a giant leap in performance is one of the key reasons for the CUDA platform’s widespread adoption This, so much. Other platforms continue to ignore develo…
-
comment
Comment #48904456
> unimportant implementation detail that should be assessed on performance alone rather than usability I disagree. Usability is important, or you end up with garbage like Vulkan. I…
-
comment
Comment #48757781
Having participated in many studies, I lost much faith in studies. You could study the same thing, and get opposite results depending on how you build the study, which people parti…
-
comment
Comment #48731799
That's exactly the one I'm really satisfied with.
-
comment
Comment #48721564
That was an interesting read. Also enjoyed reading about the semaphores in the default stream. It's great that cuda implicitly handles syncing of commands for users and makes paral…
-
comment
Comment #48720029
I like the driver API because it allows treating Cuda kernels like hot-reloadable shaders. It's fun to develop while being able to change the code at runtime.
-
comment
Comment #48718567
For me, the 20€/months subscriptions were always sufficient, and it's nice if that subscription give the latest and greatest results.
-
comment
Comment #48697404
I haven't tried the latest Codex but I switched from GPT to Claude because I think Claude writes much better Code. GPT's code ends up way more verbose/complex/overengineered than i…
-
comment
Comment #48687505
I've always considered shared_ptr to be semi-garbage collection. Allows me to code C++ almost as if it were Java so long as circular references are avoided. I'm perfectly fine with…
-
comment
Comment #42956995
You're skillfully dodging the point: Trilinear filtering is in no way an "ideal" alternative. It has worse quality than something like a Lanczos filter, and it requires computing i…
-
comment
Comment #42849427
Trilinear requires an image pyramid. Without downsampling to create that image pyramid, you can't even do trilinear sampling, so your argument strikes me as odd and circular. Like …
-
comment
Comment #40979076
OpenCL isn't nice to use and lacks tons of quality of life features. I wouldn't use it, even if it was double as fast as CUDA.
-
comment
Comment #40594865
Sure is, but there is nothing stopping AMD or Intel from building a working alternative to CUDA, so how is it anti-competitive? The problem with OpenCL, Sycl, ROC, etc. is that the…
-
comment
Comment #40594852
The magic is that CUDA actually works well. There is no reason to pick OpenCL, ROCm, Sycl or others if you get a 10x better developer experience with CUDA.