Viewing profile — mrow84
mrow84
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jul 27, 2013, 6:56 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 885
- Public activity
- 401 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mrow84
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #44790576
> The case emerged on July 20, when both organizations filed a complaint with the Belgian federal prosecutor against two members of the Israeli army’s Givati Brigade who were atten…
-
comment
Comment #32117242
All that bloodline stuff is real, but it’s a pretty small fraction of the population. Most people’s experience of class difference in the UK is economic, not hereditary (I think).
-
comment
Comment #32116005
Your layman’s answer still doesn’t quite do it for me - if you had two masses in space, joined together by a wire, and you span them around their combined centre of mass, angular m…
-
comment
Comment #32105210
“The argument is inescapable: Studies that are underpowered for the detection of plausible effects must occasionally return non-significant results even when the research hypothesi…
-
comment
Comment #32056186
That seems to be the author’s intent - to explain why we are having the discussion, rather than dismissing the cause as mere hysteria.
-
comment
Comment #32052403
The claim wasn’t that there was an increase in control beyond that which you acknowledge (improved granularity) - it was about how that new power will be used. It could be used to …
-
comment
Comment #31928631
The sources I looked at (e.g. [0]) suggest a maximum temperature of 91 F with a humidity of maybe 72 %, equating to a wet bulb of 28.51 C [1]. Are you sure about those temperatures…
-
comment
Comment #31845508
According to [0] there are more than 3.5 million births per year, so a bit more than 100 million since 1990. 1.5% isn’t insignificant, but I wouldn’t call it huge. [0] https://www.…
-
comment
Comment #31791366
> Most people would probably agree the latest models generalize better than flatworms. > Flatworms first appeared 800+ million years ago Surviving for 800 million years seems to me…
-
comment
Comment #31663057
I think you’re probably broadly right, because containers won’t be very useful, but in different circumstances things can be more complex than “a couple tiny shrimp and sightless f…
-
comment
Comment #31578693
I find your exposition difficult to follow, perhaps you could write out your proposed solution without the accompanying explanatory text, so that we can clearly see how it resolves…
-
comment
Comment #31578642
You are conflating the quantity A, which is a label for the (unknown in the original formulation) amount in the chosen envelope, with the "smaller amount" - labelled x in the wikip…
-
comment
Comment #31578269
In the variant under discussion A is defined as 60: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31574239
-
comment
Comment #31577842
Inserting A=60 into the original line of reasoning (just to show that it doesn't immediately resolve the paradox): 1. Denote by A=60 the amount in the player's selected envelope. 2…
-
comment
Comment #31561404
> If you make tangential observations the conversation may move tangentially. You (presumably) have agency, and could have chosen to answer the main question rather than labouring …
-
comment
Comment #31560605
I didn't suggest that angular velocity is the same as linear velocity, I asked how you were interpreting the area and velocity, and parenthetically observed that the angular veloci…
-
comment
Comment #31560019
In what way are you trying to interpret the area, or indeed the velocity (indeed the angular velocity is constant)? As I understand it, the intent of the visualisation is simply to…
-
comment
Comment #31546618
Goods getting cheaper broadly means that supply is going up relative to demand - we call this deflation. If the supply of money goes up relative to demand then we call that inflati…
-
comment
Comment #31431260
How do you use it, out of interest?
-
comment
Comment #31339186
> In the symbolic regression approach, the solution would be limited by the number of different observable variables available to train the model on. What do you mean here? Aren't …
-
comment
Comment #31294055
Even if you believe that: 1. the wealth of such people corresponds solely to an increase in the pool of available wealth (as opposed to just redistribution from other people), and …
-
comment
Comment #30878934
One method is to drop variables with small coefficients in the top n principal components. This is feature selection, by your definition.
-
comment
Comment #30759052
You are begging the question. If you start with the assumption that distribution must be organised solely by monetary exchange then of course any kind of collectivisation is going …
-
comment
Comment #30265941
This assumes a lot about the underlying process, particularly independence. Whilst assuming independence might hold reasonably well for low numbers of samples, the assumption might…
-
comment
Comment #30183916
From the “see also” on that page, this looks pretty incredible (to my untrained eye): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Williams_X-Jet