Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — mrow84

mrow84

HN member
Joined
Sat, Jul 27, 2013, 6:56 PM UTC
HN karma
885
Public activity
401 items

About mrow84

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #44790576

    > The case emerged on July 20, when both organizations filed a complaint with the Belgian federal prosecutor against two members of the Israeli army’s Givati Brigade who were atten…

  2. comment
    Comment #32117242

    All that bloodline stuff is real, but it’s a pretty small fraction of the population. Most people’s experience of class difference in the UK is economic, not hereditary (I think).

  3. comment
    Comment #32116005

    Your layman’s answer still doesn’t quite do it for me - if you had two masses in space, joined together by a wire, and you span them around their combined centre of mass, angular m…

  4. comment
    Comment #32105210

    “The argument is inescapable: Studies that are underpowered for the detection of plausible effects must occasionally return non-significant results even when the research hypothesi…

  5. comment
    Comment #32056186

    That seems to be the author’s intent - to explain why we are having the discussion, rather than dismissing the cause as mere hysteria.

  6. comment
    Comment #32052403

    The claim wasn’t that there was an increase in control beyond that which you acknowledge (improved granularity) - it was about how that new power will be used. It could be used to …

  7. comment
    Comment #31928631

    The sources I looked at (e.g. [0]) suggest a maximum temperature of 91 F with a humidity of maybe 72 %, equating to a wet bulb of 28.51 C [1]. Are you sure about those temperatures…

  8. comment
    Comment #31845508

    According to [0] there are more than 3.5 million births per year, so a bit more than 100 million since 1990. 1.5% isn’t insignificant, but I wouldn’t call it huge. [0] https://www.…

  9. comment
    Comment #31791366

    > Most people would probably agree the latest models generalize better than flatworms. > Flatworms first appeared 800+ million years ago Surviving for 800 million years seems to me…

  10. comment
    Comment #31663057

    I think you’re probably broadly right, because containers won’t be very useful, but in different circumstances things can be more complex than “a couple tiny shrimp and sightless f…

  11. comment
    Comment #31578693

    I find your exposition difficult to follow, perhaps you could write out your proposed solution without the accompanying explanatory text, so that we can clearly see how it resolves…

  12. comment
    Comment #31578642

    You are conflating the quantity A, which is a label for the (unknown in the original formulation) amount in the chosen envelope, with the "smaller amount" - labelled x in the wikip…

  13. comment
    Comment #31578269

    In the variant under discussion A is defined as 60: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31574239

  14. comment
    Comment #31577842

    Inserting A=60 into the original line of reasoning (just to show that it doesn't immediately resolve the paradox): 1. Denote by A=60 the amount in the player's selected envelope. 2…

  15. comment
    Comment #31561404

    > If you make tangential observations the conversation may move tangentially. You (presumably) have agency, and could have chosen to answer the main question rather than labouring …

  16. comment
    Comment #31560605

    I didn't suggest that angular velocity is the same as linear velocity, I asked how you were interpreting the area and velocity, and parenthetically observed that the angular veloci…

  17. comment
    Comment #31560019

    In what way are you trying to interpret the area, or indeed the velocity (indeed the angular velocity is constant)? As I understand it, the intent of the visualisation is simply to…

  18. comment
    Comment #31546618

    Goods getting cheaper broadly means that supply is going up relative to demand - we call this deflation. If the supply of money goes up relative to demand then we call that inflati…

  19. comment
    Comment #31431260

    How do you use it, out of interest?

  20. comment
    Comment #31339186

    > In the symbolic regression approach, the solution would be limited by the number of different observable variables available to train the model on. What do you mean here? Aren't …

  21. comment
    Comment #31294055

    Even if you believe that: 1. the wealth of such people corresponds solely to an increase in the pool of available wealth (as opposed to just redistribution from other people), and …

  22. comment
    Comment #30878934

    One method is to drop variables with small coefficients in the top n principal components. This is feature selection, by your definition.

  23. comment
    Comment #30759052

    You are begging the question. If you start with the assumption that distribution must be organised solely by monetary exchange then of course any kind of collectivisation is going …

  24. comment
    Comment #30265941

    This assumes a lot about the underlying process, particularly independence. Whilst assuming independence might hold reasonably well for low numbers of samples, the assumption might…

  25. comment
    Comment #30183916

    From the “see also” on that page, this looks pretty incredible (to my untrained eye): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Williams_X-Jet