Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — mrexcess

mrexcess

HN member
Joined
Tue, Dec 30, 2025, 12:57 PM UTC
HN karma
83
Public activity
113 items

About mrexcess

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
  2. comment
    Comment #48087933

    There are a number of technological / legal hybrid policies developing that come at the very jugular vein of computing freedom - the notion of a “general purpose” computer itself. …

  3. comment
    Comment #48077705

    I definitely buy into the “monoculture” argument a bit. When hundreds of millions of people are all voraciously consuming the same very limited cultural messaging - three TV statio…

  4. comment
    Comment #48077149

    The revelations that Epstein had interest and involvement in the development of 4chan really makes me wonder what we would find behind the curtain at next iterations like KiwiFarms…

  5. comment
    Comment #48076672

    lol honestly, I think a little on the contrary. If we can make a thing impossible technically, the law defers to that. One thing the government really can’t do easily in Western co…

  6. comment
    Comment #48075183

    Legal solutions to technical problems are always dubious, especially when privacy against government surveillance is the problem.

  7. comment
    Comment #48074003

    Web of trust or centralized trust are the main answers here. Compromise of the secret key is a whole other issue - revocation. MITM of a key can be solved pretty well via web of tr…

  8. comment
    Comment #48073966

    True but the out of band secure channel could just be something like DNS, automated and constantly subject to distributed monitoring for deltas.

  9. comment
    Comment #48073806

    Webs of trust based on OOB key verification and signing, or centralized trust authorities are the two primary models I’m aware of. I’ve always been enamored of the idea of DNS as a…

  10. comment
    Comment #48073679

    I would agree that it’s silly. So did former President Obama when he mocked the notion recently. While motivating intent is always opaque to some extent, this would appear to be an…

  11. comment
    Comment #48073632

    You’re not sure what key fingerprints are? Bob and Alice are setting up their e2e channel, and because they have some extra level of concern about snooping, they telephone each oth…

  12. comment
    Comment #48071217

    I’m not sure why you think so? If the service provider claims E2E but intentionally provides a defective version of this, it’s a pretty clear cut violation of the federal statute, …

  13. comment
    Comment #48070121

    > Public pressure works to a certain degree. Do you think a product manager at Meta would want to be labeled as "protecting pedos"? I think that Meta can afford as much PR as they …

  14. comment
    Comment #48070108

    That would seem to constitute Honest Services Fraud under federal law, if they promised E2E then sabotaged it intentionally…

  15. comment
    Comment #48070098

    > And how does one verify that the public key received belongs to the intended party, rather than a mitm? Fingerprints. Again, this is like Crypto 101. Not saying that as a persona…

  16. comment
    Comment #48069887

    > The authority holds Meta responsible anyway What form of accountability are you suggesting is even being leveraged, here? No law could force Meta to backdoor its encryption, afai…

  17. comment
    Comment #48069842

    The answer to most everyone question you’re asking is just, “public key cryptography”. It’s kind of disheartening to me that such basic 1990s tech as implemented by Phil Zimmerman …

  18. comment
    Comment #48067214

    “Operation Infektion” attempted to blame the emergence of HIV/AIDS in the 80s to biological weapon attacks by the US. There has been some coverage of the explosion in occult and uf…

  19. comment
    Comment #48065890

    Shades of late Soviet distractioneering, of the sort one would see in Pravda back in the day. Really disconcerting tbqh.

  20. comment
    Comment #48061353

    Or, worryingly, unsolicited brainwashing, no?

  21. comment
    Comment #48053407

    China does not have “shareholders”, though. There are incredibly substantive differences between the accountability structures and expectations of shareholders, and those that gove…

  22. comment
    Comment #48048092

    Comparisons between CCP and private industry in the West seems misaligned in several respects. CCP does not have fiduciary duty to shareholders, instead, it has accountability to n…

  23. comment
    Comment #48044473

    So you prefer to avoid the competition entirely because you expect to lose? Not very confident in American industrial competitiveness, are we?

  24. comment
    Comment #48044461

    > You have a near-permanent upper class that has no real political opposition that could impact their value creation ambitions. Sorry, what? China regularly prosecutes billionaires…

  25. comment
    Comment #48044390

    Given the Trump administration’s actions against private industry from TikTok, to Anthropic, to a hundred other examples from auto makers to air conditioning manufacturers, is it f…