Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — movpasd

movpasd

HN member
Joined
Sat, Jan 28, 2023, 3:53 PM UTC
HN karma
549
Public activity
143 items

About movpasd

I have worked for five years on mathematical modelling of UK electricity wholesale market and some data science–adjacent stuff. Moving into web development. Theoretical physics background. Interested in systems and programming languages.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49243267

    It's just economics. VCs dump large amounts of money into early-stage platforms with the express purpose of exploiting it later. This is an inevitable part of the lifecycle of high…

  2. comment
    Comment #49206615

    It's LLM-like in the details, but there are certain patterns of repetition and idiosyncrasies, also certain analogies I don't think an LLM would make (like the aliens thing), that …

  3. comment
    Comment #49156616

    Forgive me if a dumb question, but is there no compaction? Do you ever run out of context?

  4. comment
    Comment #49120776

    Me as well. One of my formative experiences was reading Refactoring (Fowler). At the time I felt skeptical that it could make a difference --- I had mostly written scientific/resea…

  5. comment
    Comment #49107641

    I feel like the development of AI has really shown what a gigantic spectrum intelligence actually is.

  6. comment
    Comment #49107534

    There's an "expert trap" in here I think, at least this is something I experience. When you are good at something, it's a lot less effort to draw on that stuff, and you usually get…

  7. comment
    Comment #48806428

    I don't expect technology companies to do the right thing by the consumer. There is a niche for companies or NGOs that manage to stick to their core mission, but the incentive stru…

  8. comment
    Comment #48785286

    You're talking about the material of the Twitter discussions where I'm more discussing the article itself, which is about the community and discourse surrounding it. If you want my…

  9. comment
    Comment #48784512

    I despise the "what's true is true" attitude exhibited by Casey and Bill in these tweets. I find it to be an instant flag of unreliability. The smartest human alive is still a huma…

  10. comment
    Comment #48758533

    I think an important realisation for me was this: peoples' egos being involved in their arguments, people being irrational, and so on, these are not merely deviations from an ideal…

  11. comment
    Comment #48717225

    Not GP, but I'd argue that over-rationalism and underestimating both the complexity of the real world and the theory-ladenness of one's perspective is just as dangerous. The point …

  12. comment
    Comment #48582825

    I've not done particularly rigorous testing, but I've done this a lot with Claude to get a feel. What I've noticed is for certain open-ended tasks, Claude is extremely primeable: i…

  13. comment
    Comment #48533366

    > If you want to go out of your way to interpret things as uncharitably as possible, you'll find yourself missing out on a lot of potential wisdom. Thank you for that line --- I ma…

  14. comment
    Comment #48443339

    The original sin is the idea that the profit motive on a free market will solve all our resource allocation problems, and that consumption demand should be the ultimate arbiter of …

  15. comment
    Comment #48346373

    I think the foundational one is for Western governments to treat critical digital infrastructure for what it is: critical infrastructure. We don't let private capital build nuclear…

  16. comment
    Comment #48334528

    Because you must statically declare dependency on an effect, it's opt-in. To be clear, you still pay indirection cost: when you do opt in you have to hope the upstairs implementati…

  17. comment
    Comment #48334482

    One of the things I find most exciting about effect systems is that they solve some of the issues with typeclasses and traits. The issue with these is you can provide exactly one i…

  18. comment
    Comment #48334281

    I think the point is that even if AI returns don't materialise, there is a dangerous implicit political project among AI moguls to get to this state. Even if we get 10% the way the…

  19. comment
    Comment #48329879

    You're assuming that the free market will do what it's meant to do. But there is also a reality that there are plenty of structural market failures in the economy that arise from e…

  20. comment
    Comment #48329803

    This article puts into words a lot of things that had been on my mind as missing in AI discourse. Most significantly, actually considering the _systemic consequences_ of the promis…

  21. comment
    Comment #48306240

    Attraction towards equilibrium is real, but that equilibrium is not a given. It comes from intrinsic biological constraints, individual preferences, cultural norms, ideology, habit…

  22. comment
    Comment #48277430

    I have a couple principles to help me work with this. The first is that even though the object is not a human, you should still exercise politeness and restraint. Like the article …

  23. comment
    Comment #48140006

    I feel the same way, and yet I would still say I feel AI usage atrophying my thinking skills. I feel less tempted to use it to shortcut whole files, but even just using it to speed…

  24. comment
    Comment #48120074

    Regarding the tension between symbolic representation and Naur "theory", I'd actually say they come from two different traditions, each providing two different theses. When writing…

  25. comment
    Comment #48093438

    "Worse is better" remains relevant as ever. https://www.jwz.org/doc/worse-is-better.html