Viewing profile — mota7
mota7
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jul 08, 2018, 12:29 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 141
- Public activity
- 27 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mota7
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48649029
Heat is mostly driven by leakage current and gate capacitance. The big issue today is leakage currents. They typical account for around 30%-50% of total chip thermal budget, and th…
-
comment
Comment #48350231
If you have two threads on different cores that write to the same cacheline, the CPU has to enforce write ordering. The way it does this is for one of the cores to acquire a write …
-
comment
Comment #44998668
Is there really that big a different in TFLOPS between the GB100 and GB202 chips? The GB100 has fewer SMs than the GB202, so I'm confused about where the 10x performance would be c…
-
comment
Comment #44791218
Land the western australia wheat belt sells for less than $1000/acre. Is that very expensive?
-
comment
Comment #43785321
Yes that bugged me too. If you replace 'precisely' with 'approximately' everywhere in the article it becomes much improved ;)
-
comment
Comment #43668478
There's basically a difference in philosophy. GPU chips have a bunch of cores, each of which is semi-capable, whereas TPU chips have (effectively) one enormous core. So GPUs have ~…
-
comment
Comment #42391794
The hand-waving explanation: The slower you're going, the easier (cheaper) it is to change direction. And for eliptical orbits, the outer-most part of the orbit is where you're goi…
-
comment
Comment #41890236
Not quite: It's taking advantage of (1+a)(1+b) = 1 + a + b + ab. And where a and b are both small-ish, ab is really small and can just be ignored. So it turns the (1+a)(1+b) into 1…
-
comment
Comment #41781277
I had the same thought: Just eye-balling the graphs, the result of the subtraction looks very close to just reducing the temperature. They're effectively doing softmax with a fixed…
-
comment
Comment #35099766
The paper says "... optimized on next-word prediction only". Which is absolutely correct in 2023. ChatGPT (and indeed all recent LLMs) using much more complex training methods than…
-
comment
Comment #35048768
Like most things, it's more complex than that, and as a result it can be either faster or slower than 'median(RTT to each DC in quorum)'. It's a delicate balance based on the locat…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #34432985
> Gradient accumulation doesn't work with batch norms so you really need that memory. Last I looked, very few SOTA models are trained with batch normalization. Most of the LLMs use…
-
comment
Comment #34188620
It's hard to convey just how ridiculously complex and expensive 5nm is compared with 90nm. 5nm is a multi-billion dollar fab, absurdly high running costs, and very expensive wafers…
-
comment
Comment #33219198
Excellent example: "reflective cistern tank with a reflection of the back of a truck transporting stop signs" People tend to forget just how hard the edge cases in vision are!
-
comment
Comment #33217648
Do you know why the blood thinners helped? (I'm assuming there was some underlying condition that this treated?)
-
comment
Comment #33088291
The problem is that predicting a pixel requires knowing what the pixels around it looks like. But if we start with lots of noise, then the neighboring pixels are all just noise and…
-
comment
Comment #32600809
Minimum is around 1 kWh/m^3 for sea-water levels of salt concentration. (It varies a fair bit depending on salinity, the actual salts involved, the temperature etc etc).
-
comment
Comment #32600773
This is surprisingly poor production? Peak insolation varies widely, but 1000W/m^2 is a typical value. 5.8L/hr/m^2 means that it's using something like 180kWh/m^3 on raw solar inso…
-
comment
Comment #31454119
Nuts, you are correct that it isn't optimal. It's not quite as simple as just 2 bits per digit, because the last digit can only be large if the earlier digits are small. This makes…
-
comment
Comment #31452071
For the first case, you can't pick a number lower than any existing number. So if 4 is already picked, then only 5 or 6 can be picked, but if we pick 6, then there's no third numbe…
-
comment
Comment #31443308
Yes. The formulation in the blog post is a bit messy, but possibly more general way to think about it is something like: 0. set y = 1. set x = 0. 1. How many possible choices are t…
-
comment
Comment #24820868
It's still interesting as it reflects that despite 60,000 images, there's a very small amount of data that the network actually learns. The total entropy in 10 images (even careful…
-
comment
Comment #24820514
The difficultly here is that there's an implicit assumption: 'Noise' is implicitly defined to be anything that isn't learned by the network. Now in same cases that may indeed be ac…
-
comment
Comment #24772070
Can't up-vote this hard enough!