Viewing profile — moshetanzer
moshetanzer
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jan 08, 2026, 6:23 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 6
- Public activity
- 25 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About moshetanzer
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
-
comment
Comment #46792728
Yeah that is what we also figured. We are using https://forwardmyinbox.com which works quite well.
-
story
Ask HN: How are you handling Gmail ending POP3 and Gmailify?
Starting January 2026, Gmail is removing support for POP3 and Gmailify. This means millions of people who rely on Gmail to consolidate emails from other accounts will suddenly lose…
-
story
Show HN: Forward My Inbox – IMAP‑to‑Gmail Forwarding After Gmail Kills POP3
Google is killing POP3/Gmailify in January 2026, breaking workflows for fetching email into Gmail. I built Forward My Inbox ( https://forwardmyinbox.com ) as a replacement: connect…
-
story
Ask HN: Why do we wait for PR to review obvious slop
It drives me crazy the amount of noise there is on all the PR ai code reviews. There is so much that could be caught by reviews before - maybe at commit time? Is this just me??
-
story
Ask HN: Why does it still make sense to review stupid bugs at PR time?
Ask HN, Code reviews are essential, but I keep seeing the same pattern: PR reviews are full of comments about trivial bugs, lint issues, and convention mismatches that could have b…
-
comment
Comment #46629830
Ask HN, It feels increasingly backwards that PR reviews are where we catch basic bugs, style issues, and convention violations. With AI writing a large chunk of code now, the volum…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #46589236
https://commitguard.ai code reviews that are faster than linter that auto run pre commit and fully configurable.
-
comment
Comment #46589166
Most code review happens at PR time, after code is already written, tested, and context is gone. With more AI-written code, tests pass but logic issues still slip through. Would ea…
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #46573712
Hey.
-
comment
Comment #46573514
Linters are great for style and syntax, but logic errors still rely heavily on human review. Do you think a linter for code logic - for example: risky condition changes, missing er…
- story
-
comment
Comment #46570467
Hi HN, I spent some time improving the CommitGuard landing page to make it clearer and more direct about what the tool does. I’d love your honest feedback, does it make sense at a …
- story
-
comment
Comment #46569187
Yip this won’t help them. Though I sure help there aren’t a lot of them ;)
-
story
Show HN: Commit-based code review instead of PR-based
Hi HN, I’m experimenting with commit-based code review as an alternative to PR-based review. Instead of analyzing large PR diffs, this reviews each commit incrementally, while cont…
-
comment
Comment #46545156
i like the idea v nice
-
comment
Comment #46544950
its not :)
-
comment
Comment #46544551
I have found that PR based code reviews are two noisy and non configurable. Also unpredictable as to when they will run or if all is ok. Also it is never clear who’s problem it is …
- story