Viewing profile — montyedwards
montyedwards
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Apr 02, 2016, 2:53 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 38
- Public activity
- 15 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About montyedwards
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #12874042
Not disagreeing with you or the postmortem, but: 1. that post is from Feb 8, 2016 2. nanomsg 1.0 was released on June 10, 2016 After nanomsg 1.0 release, recent activity on github …
-
comment
Comment #12695208
No idea when LibreSSL will add X25519 or X448, as defined in RFC 7748 - Elliptic Curves for Security. Here's RFC 7748 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7748 Here's the errata for RFC …
-
comment
Comment #12692931
I'm currently evaluating LibreSSL for use in data protection software I licensed to a large company. The optional libtls API bundled with LibreSSL is a really simple wrapper API th…
-
comment
Comment #12583263
Swift is good for enterprises that standardized on Macs and ios devices, but there aren't many of those (yet). I'm pretty sure Swift isn't ready on Windows, which is a shame becaus…
-
comment
Comment #12248446
Nobody is suggesting OpenBSD not being RedHat should be embarrassing. However, it is not ideal to have a security-focused OS not directly provide binpatches for the base system and…
-
comment
Comment #12226533
Anyone interested in using ECC should take a glance at SafeCurves: choosing safe curves for elliptic-curve cryptography http://safecurves.cr.yp.to/ There's a nice table showing whi…
-
comment
Comment #11995918
Rust has: - Static typing - Type inference (and pattern matching) - No dependency on JVM, .NET, or BEAM But the number of web frameworks, etc. for Rust sucks compared to that of ol…
-
comment
Comment #11994056
Servo would be more compelling for use with commercial software if had MIT or Apache license. The MPL isn't as bad as GPL but still isn't as generous to the developer as MIT or Apa…
-
comment
Comment #11989018
I understand, but none of those links are the .NET Core 1.0 release announcements. And the download page for .NET Core 1.0 doesn't mention FreeBSD at https://www.microsoft.com/net/…
-
comment
Comment #11987054
I don't see mention of FreeBSD anywhere in the .NET Core 1.0 announcements -- has official support for FreeBSD dropped or been postponed?
-
comment
Comment #11708727
I don't see downloads for FreeBSD. CoreCLR (.NET Core) mentions FreeBSD at github, but nothing from Microsoft's announement of RC2.
-
comment
Comment #11617340
The Go programming language doesn't compile to C. Compiling Go is faster than compiling C. If Go transpiled into C code first, and then had to compile resulting C code, then that e…
-
comment
Comment #11489155
I'd use OpenBSD if it provided: 1. significantly faster vioscsi(4) driver for VirtIO SCSI adapters -- I can live with vioscsi being up to 2x slower than Ubuntu or FreeBSD, but 5x -…
-
comment
Comment #11414423
I tried TDM-GCC. In my experience, certain aspects increase risks when using go: 1. go is buggier for Windows than Linux and FreeBSD, even though they are all "first class" platfor…
-
comment
Comment #11411728
The only thing preventing me from using Go on Windows is lack of production quality cgo on Windows x86 and x64. For example, using external linking should "just work" with recent v…