Viewing profile — monstrado
monstrado
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Mar 23, 2012, 9:42 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 415
- Public activity
- 172 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About monstrado
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45117876
I think the point of ACP being an open protocol is so that other editors (e.g. VSCode, Neovim) can implement it as a receiver and integration with ClaudeCode/GeminiCLI/... would ju…
-
comment
Comment #39031748
No write up, but the main reason was reusing the existing database we were comfortable deploying at the time. We were already using FDB for an online aggregation / mutation store f…
-
comment
Comment #39030038
I leveraged FoundationDB and RecordLayer to build a transactional catalog system for all our data services at a previous company, and it was honestly just an amazing piece of softw…
-
comment
Comment #37987794
One reason would be if you're already fluent in ClickHouse's SQL dialect. Although they maintain great standard SQL compatibility, they also have a great deal of special functions/…
-
comment
Comment #36574831
I built an online / mutable time-series database using FDB a few years back at a previous company. Not only was it rock solid, but it scaled linearly pretty effortlessly. It truly …
-
comment
Comment #34348689
As an engineer who admires the work done by DuckDB, I'm disappointed that the co-founder of its evolution is spreading FUD about competitors before its even in the competitive conv…
-
comment
Comment #33081864
Disclaimer: I work at ClickHouse At a previous company, I wrote a simple TCP server to receive LineProtocol, parse it and write to ClickHouse. I was absolutely blown away by how fa…
-
comment
Comment #32545338
Not sure if I hit those limits, we were at around 100 nodes and over 170-180 processes. The biggest thing we recognized was tuning the number of recruited proxies and other statele…
-
comment
Comment #32542536
Running it locally is as easy as downloading and installing. Scaling FDB is a bit more of a challenge partially due to their process-per-core design decision, which coincidently he…
-
comment
Comment #32542488
This project (mvSQLite) appears to have found a way around the 5s transaction limit as well as the size, so that's really promising. That being said, I believe the new RedWood stor…
-
comment
Comment #32540525
This is exactly what the engineers behind FoundationDB (FDB) wanted when they open sourced. For those who don't know, FDB provides a transactional (and distributed) ordered key-val…
-
comment
Comment #31675202
Curious when the folks at ClickHouse are going to decide to spin its custom rewrite of ZooKeeper in C++ (ClickHouse-Keeper [1]) out into its own separate project. [1] https://click…
-
comment
Comment #30856338
Is this the project you guys referenced using Apache Arrow for?
-
comment
Comment #29579652
The introduction of parallelized Parquet reads coupled with s3Cluster is really awesome. I feel ClickHouse is one step closer to unlocking the ephemeral SQL compute cluster (e.g. P…
-
comment
Comment #29099555
I've had a really positive experience using ClickHouse as an InfluxDB replacement. Initially I used the BUFFERED table type to overcome the "tiny inserts" problem, but ultimately j…
-
comment
Comment #29099174
While I really enjoyed this read, it'd be nice to see benchmarks which also measure Queries-Per-Second under a highly concurrent workload. I've been using ClickHouse to serve live …
-
comment
Comment #29098637
This has been my experience with ClickHouse as well...that is, you can basically close your eyes while writing the schema and still maintain to get extremely impressive performance…
-
comment
Comment #28599455
I'm excited for the future of ClickHouse! I'm hopeful that this move will help smooth out the rough-edges of ClickHouse, mainly around clustering.
-
comment
Comment #28356649
This looks really promising! Could you provide at a high-level what this aims to offer over FoundationDB's RecordLayer[1]? [1] https://github.com/FoundationDB/fdb-record-layer
-
comment
Comment #28170428
Not sure about the large stores, but i've had luck getting my balls at the local mom and pop tennis supply stores.
- story
-
comment
Comment #27436042
The key takeaways of FoundationDB is that it is a strongly consistent KeyValue store that preserves ordering (lexicographical). Although you might consider FDB's APIs to be quite p…
-
comment
Comment #27426798
Have nothing but praise for FoundationDB. It has been by far the most rock solid distributed database I have ever had the pleasure of using. I used to manage HBase clusters, and th…
-
comment
Comment #27082069
I feel like OP might be thinking of gRPC, which seems to closely resemble the use case Smithy is tackling.
-
comment
Comment #26918960
MinIO is an option as well and would allow you to transition from testing in S3 to your own MinIO cluster seamlessly.