Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — molikto

molikto

HN member
Joined
Thu, Dec 19, 2013, 2:27 PM UTC
HN karma
6
Public activity
23 items

About molikto

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
  2. comment
    Comment #42190849

    convertTree doesn't work because Tree uses Tree type recursively.

  3. story
    Show HN: A VIM-inspired keyboard only interface for WYSIWYG rich text editor?

    Hello, I am working on a project that you can think as Typora + Vim keybindings. Here is a demo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97lAMRrAcF4&feature=youtu.be I have previously post…

  4. comment
    Comment #18457519

    monaco is not a rich text editor

  5. comment
    Comment #17178875

    Chinese app Xiami already has this

  6. comment
    Comment #16314273

    My idea about conflicts is, since OT is a centralized protocol, the server can refuse some conflicts and let user to resolve it. Another thing I don't like about CRDT is for text e…

  7. comment
    Comment #16314208

    I am planning to doing the same thing, but using OT.

  8. comment
    Comment #15630071

    Nine Stories Franny and Zooey

  9. comment
    Comment #15546895

    Why use monospace font?????

  10. story
  11. comment
    Comment #13986050

    What about a better interface for Coq? I think this makes more sense to experienced programmers. Also for mankind.

  12. comment
    Comment #13961635

    https://www.quora.com/Is-China-colonizing-Asia-and-Africa/an...

  13. comment
    Comment #13731863

    They had Google Tasks, now they have Reminders in Google Calendar

  14. comment
    Comment #12310348

    I know DL. but will never use Python... 23333

  15. comment
    Comment #11770133

    Please don't say it is faster than SQLite anymore. http://kpgalligan.tumblr.com/post/133281929963/my-talk-at-dr...

  16. comment
  17. comment
    Comment #9554735

    Hi, what's your current project now?

  18. story
  19. story
  20. comment
    Comment #8782270

    is there anything in the world that is non-nonsense? so it is better to study pure-nonsense, just because it is pure

  21. comment
    Comment #8780430

    what about categorial semantics? hahaha!!!

  22. comment
    Comment #8445685

    What's the point?

  23. comment
    Comment #7655025

    Is there any reference for transactional semantics?