Viewing profile — molikto
molikto
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Dec 19, 2013, 2:27 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 6
- Public activity
- 23 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About molikto
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- comment
-
comment
Comment #42190849
convertTree doesn't work because Tree uses Tree type recursively.
-
story
Show HN: A VIM-inspired keyboard only interface for WYSIWYG rich text editor?
Hello, I am working on a project that you can think as Typora + Vim keybindings. Here is a demo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97lAMRrAcF4&feature=youtu.be I have previously post…
-
comment
Comment #18457519
monaco is not a rich text editor
-
comment
Comment #17178875
Chinese app Xiami already has this
-
comment
Comment #16314273
My idea about conflicts is, since OT is a centralized protocol, the server can refuse some conflicts and let user to resolve it. Another thing I don't like about CRDT is for text e…
-
comment
Comment #16314208
I am planning to doing the same thing, but using OT.
-
comment
Comment #15630071
Nine Stories Franny and Zooey
-
comment
Comment #15546895
Why use monospace font?????
- story
-
comment
Comment #13986050
What about a better interface for Coq? I think this makes more sense to experienced programmers. Also for mankind.
-
comment
Comment #13961635
https://www.quora.com/Is-China-colonizing-Asia-and-Africa/an...
-
comment
Comment #13731863
They had Google Tasks, now they have Reminders in Google Calendar
-
comment
Comment #12310348
I know DL. but will never use Python... 23333
-
comment
Comment #11770133
Please don't say it is faster than SQLite anymore. http://kpgalligan.tumblr.com/post/133281929963/my-talk-at-dr...
- comment
-
comment
Comment #9554735
Hi, what's your current project now?
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #8782270
is there anything in the world that is non-nonsense? so it is better to study pure-nonsense, just because it is pure
-
comment
Comment #8780430
what about categorial semantics? hahaha!!!
-
comment
Comment #8445685
What's the point?
-
comment
Comment #7655025
Is there any reference for transactional semantics?