Viewing profile — mobeets
mobeets
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Dec 08, 2023, 6:47 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 49
- Public activity
- 24 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mobeets
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49161216
Agreed. Also it seems like, if the actual test scores and perceived test scores were both sampled iid, the “perceived” line should just be flat, with everyone being at 50th percent…
-
comment
Comment #48736133
Por que no los dos? Scientific review times are up, it’s harder to find reviewers, and many reviews are AI generated anyway. Auto-generated research publications will arguably make…
-
comment
Comment #48518184
Thank you for writing a much more thoughtful reply to this comment than I was drafting
-
comment
Comment #47948339
Good point, this is probably the author assuming a little more context on the reader’s part. The cases where you can record from neurons in humans are very rare (basically only in …
-
comment
Comment #47238417
This approach implies the probability doesn’t depend on N. It only happens to be 1/2 for N=4 (the article goes into this). The trick is that you don’t know beforehand which semicir…
-
comment
Comment #46287773
Matlab is annoying for many reasons. But to me the main advantage of using Matlab over Python is the plotting. Plotting in Python is still a pain. Notebooks help, but they still do…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #46087446
One surprise of reading this thread was learning that Terry Tao is an active user of Math Overflow!
-
comment
Comment #44887182
I was confused also. My guess was that maybe a “sequence” has to be 4 or more pebbles?
-
comment
Comment #44880922
I totally agree but unfortunately it really is one of the fundamental laws of wikipedia. To me this becomes especially silly when editing math wiki articles, where you might be tem…
-
comment
Comment #44614962
I’m with you—-I think you did a good job of summarizing all the places that LLMs are super practical/useful, but agreed that for prose (as someone who considers themselves a profic…
-
comment
Comment #44061436
I was surprised to see the author claim that citations in the Introduction are a bad thing. I do think ML papers are generally pretty bad at acknowledging other relevant literature…
-
comment
Comment #43765505
I have no idea (but wish I knew). I’m embarrassed to admit it took me years to even notice that it wasn’t being updated anymore
-
comment
Comment #43750649
Scihub hasn’t been updated since 2020! But anyway arxiv has a lot of important features specifically for academic papers (eg quality control, categories, browsing, issuing dois, et…
-
comment
Comment #42819337
without paywall: https://archive.is/eu8te
- story
-
comment
Comment #42592151
Wowwww I had no idea this was a thing. Thank you for sharing, this is perfect
-
comment
Comment #42585914
This is amazing and super inspiring. I love how such a professional looking enclosure is actually a repurposed Ikea flowerpot—-brilliant. Does anyone know how one would print the b…
-
comment
Comment #42050940
The fact that Pando is a single organism is so confusing to me. I’m guessing there are more forests like Pando that are also a single organism? Is this something unique to this par…
-
comment
Comment #40457208
Probably this (awesome) paper: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2019/hash/e98741479a7b9...
-
comment
Comment #40063191
This paper was published in this year’s issue of sigbovik, the best satirical academic journal you (may) have never heard of: https://sigbovik.org/2024/
-
comment
Comment #39206146
Can anyone explain how this works? I made this app that converts video to emojis ( https://gifmoji.github.io/ ) and would love to know if I could somehow do a similar thing over ss…
- story
-
comment
Comment #38572659
There is a big effort to do that actually, called Project CETI: https://www.projectceti.org/