Viewing profile — mmx1
mmx1
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Apr 04, 2025, 8:21 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 49
- Public activity
- 17 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mmx1
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #44048622
I am not suggesting NT is dead on servers at all. I am positing it would be dead had it not been for owning the majority of desktops. Those use cases are primarily driven as an anc…
-
comment
Comment #44046857
Obviously we'll never know, but I seriously doubt that parallel universe would've had a chance to materialize. Not the least due to "free as in beer" aspect of Linux whilst web/Apa…
-
comment
Comment #44044391
Realistically anyone who cared would be using something like Cygwin (and the original UNIX server market segment evaporated due to Linux and had zero interest in migrating to NT in…
-
comment
Comment #44038817
I don't think it is fair to brush it off under "same bucket; doesn't count." The syscalls are still different and there's quite a bit of nuance. I mean the lines you're drawing are…
-
comment
Comment #43955435
Indeed countless companies went under investing in tech, on various iterations of the exact things that later became enormously successful, e.g. iPhone. Success is only guaranteed …
-
comment
Comment #43841138
The point is precisely that being super fixated on Microsoft as a monopoly producing relatively trash-quality products is a static worldview. It is the case that Microsoft monopoly…
-
comment
Comment #43839634
I’d say the point is more subtle than that: it is not mere efficiency that comes with such scale. Rather, such scale is necessary to enable certain technological investments and lo…
-
comment
Comment #43838147
This is a good take. Also hints at why Peter Thiel's thesis on tech monopolies in a dynamic world is correct; i.e. that they aren't necessarily bad. A lot of the value in big tech …
-
comment
Comment #43790805
That's actually not true. GPLv2 by default means v2, not v3, unless you explicitly allow "or later." Linux is actually the famed example of v2 but not v3.
-
comment
Comment #43646189
Pretty sure the answer is yes. I have no direct knowledge of the matter for Gemini 2.5, but in general TPUs were widely used for training at Google. Even Apple used them to train t…
-
comment
Comment #43639668
What I've heard is that the extrapolation of compute needed so many additional CPU servers to keep running the existing workload types that it obviously justified dedicated hardwar…
-
comment
Comment #43638036
Google has done stuff primarily for negotiation purposes (e.g. POWER9 chips) but TPU ain't one. It's not a backup option or presumed "inferior solution" to NVIDIA. Their entire eco…
-
comment
Comment #43638010
I mean, it is obvious that you cannot sustain efficiency as you scale (Amdahl's law) but (1) $100M is not that crazy to be able to keep track of in your head, even for a single ind…
-
comment
Comment #43637786
Yes, IIRC (please correct me if I'm wrong), translate did utilize Seastar (TPU v1) which was integer only, so not easily useful for training.
-
comment
Comment #43626511
You can’t be serious. Lots of businesses easily have that much just in cost of goods or marketing spend. $100M is not such a crazy amount especially considering the cost of hiring …
-
story
Show HN: Inspect-HTTP-Proxy: a tool to pretty-print JSON requests/responses
A simple Go-based HTTP proxy designed for detailed inspection of requests and responses. It logs traffic to the console with colorization, automatic decompression, and formatting f…
- story