Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — mmmore

mmmore

HN member
Joined
Tue, Jul 23, 2024, 4:50 PM UTC
HN karma
169
Public activity
60 items

About mmmore

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48529509

    It's very hard for me to understand the frame a mind of the author of an article like this. I can't understand people seeing Anthropic's revenue go from $9B to $30B from January to…

  2. comment
    Comment #48237190

    This assumes that demand is elastic and unbounded. It might be true that there's a lot of untapped demand for software, but especially considering individual firms, it's plausible …

  3. comment
    Comment #48202398

    Nope, Railway was the company who was hosting PocketOS, which is the company that blamed Cursor for deleting their prod database. Railway is only involved insofar as their API allo…

  4. comment
    Comment #48194433

    I don't want to be a manager, but I also don't want to be a technician (for the most part). I want to be an engineer, which means my job is to solve problems. LLMs help me solve pr…

  5. comment
    Comment #47989023

    > If a human driver commits vehicular manslaughter, they get the book. I wish this were true. Often they get off with a light punishment, or no punishment at all.

  6. comment
    Comment #47866198

    The token prices being high for Opus undermines your argument, because it shows people are willing to pay more for the model. The thing is the new OpenAI/Anthropic models are notic…

  7. comment
    Comment #47455910

    One hidden premise of this is "AI tools are not useful now, even if they might be in the future." For example: > Few are useful to me as they are now. Except current AI tools are e…

  8. comment
    Comment #47450510

    Sure one of the companies paying for Linux desktop development is influencing what software gets development. Doesn't sound very nefarious to me. Red Hat, Canonical, etc. want a wo…

  9. comment
    Comment #47449521

    I've used Wayland (via sway) for multiple years including on machines with a 1060 and 5080 (mainly for good fractional scaling support). The only major issues I've had with it have…

  10. comment
    Comment #45585979

    You can say that, and I might even agree, but many smart people disagree. Could you explain why you believe that? Have you read in detail the arguments of people who disagree with …

  11. comment
    Comment #45466534

    Sure some of them maybe, but given that many concerned people think the chance of extinction is 10% or higher, it's not really low probability enough to be considered a Pascal's Wa…

  12. comment
    Comment #45465699

    I really don't think that very many people are concerned about AI because of Roko's Basilisk; that's more of a meme.

  13. comment
    Comment #45452390

    If you have not heard of one person worried about AIs taking over humanity, you're really not paying attention. Geoff Hinton has been warning about that since he quit Google in 201…

  14. comment
    Comment #45366141

    I think by most objective measures the size and power of large organizations has increased since WWII. For example, the size and scope of Western governments, consolidation in many…

  15. comment
    Comment #45366076

    > a zero-sum game I don't see any reference to the game being zero-sum in Tao's words. > Since when do these uncontrollable intangibles exhibit a genuine agency of their own? I don…

  16. comment
    Comment #45265424

    I genuinely think things have changed with Lurie as mayor and 6 growsf endorsed people on the board.

  17. comment
    Comment #44924789

    I find GPT-5's story significantly better than text-davinci-001

  18. comment
    Comment #44924668

    If AI that can fully replace humans is 25 years off, preparing society for its impacts is still one of the most important things to ensure that my children (which I have not had ye…

  19. comment
    Comment #44921101

    Here's a thoughtful post related to your lump of labor point: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/TkWCKzWjcbfGzdNK5/applying-t... What economists have taken seriously the premise that …

  20. comment
    Comment #44920972

    LLMs with instruction following have been around for 3 years. Your comment gives me "electricity and gas engines will never replace the horse" vibes. Everyone agrees AI has not rad…

  21. comment
    Comment #44067652

    Sonnet with extended thinking solved it after 30s for me: https://claude.ai/share/b974bd96-91f4-4d92-9aa8-7bad964e9c5a Normal Opus solved it: https://claude.ai/share/a1845cc3-bb5f-…

  22. comment
    Comment #44067505

    1. These models are trained with significant amounts of RL. So I would argue there's not a static "training dataset"; the model's outputs at each stage of the training process feed…

  23. comment
    Comment #42567458

    The comment was likely that there's no explicit search. In o1, the model has learned how to search using its context. Presumably they do this by RLing over long reasoning strings/i…

  24. comment
    Comment #42567444

    There's a few things there that could be going on that seem more likely than "hardcoded". 1. The part of the network that does complex math and the part that write poetry are overl…

  25. comment
    Comment #42567356

    My understanding is that it's in vogue to use deep learning for complex control problems, and the results are fairly impressive. The idea is to train robotic motion end to end with…