Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — mlmlmasd

mlmlmasd

HN member
Joined
Wed, Jan 18, 2017, 8:38 PM UTC
HN karma
134
Public activity
62 items

About mlmlmasd

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #13880058

    > There will not be an internet without ads The internet existed without ads perfectly fine. You can stop spreading this FUD bullshit. > The very vast majority are fine with advert…

  2. comment
    Comment #13879956

    > Advertising is necessary No it's not.

  3. comment
    Comment #13879949

    > Progress will be defined by decreasing the amount of obnoxious advertising, until we see that there is no progress and this is all talk. uBlock Origin does a good job of that :).…

  4. comment
    Comment #13879934

    > How many payments from Comcast to New York Times happen per year? Hint, the number rhymes with buck mall. I'm not good at rhymes and I have no fucking clue. Riddle my fiddle. > O…

  5. comment
    Comment #13879892

    > ISP are providing access/transit, not content. If you want to go that route, then none of the advertising companies, or companies that make money from advertising are providing t…

  6. comment
    Comment #13879850

    No I prefer everything to be free, open source, organic, and made by volunteers. You can stop pretending that there are only two options.

  7. comment
    Comment #13879633

    > What if the solution is ads blocked for a fee? The day I have to pay to not have manipulative bullshit spammed at me is the day I say goodbye to the internet. Fuck right off.

  8. comment
    Comment #13879620

    > The fact is that advertising pays for much of the internet content you consume for free. I've never had free internet... which ISP do you use? > It's because of perverse incentiv…

  9. comment
    Comment #13879560

    > most of us agree that there is no level of groping that's acceptable; whereas I _think_ that, even among those of us who would like a web with no ads, the position that there is …

  10. comment
    Comment #13879389

    This whole initiative (acceptable ads) came out of Google paying off Adblock Plus. http://www.businessinsider.com/google-microsoft-amazon-taboo...

  11. comment
    Comment #13879377

    Fuck off ABP. Use uBlock Origin.

  12. comment
    Comment #13861917

    Professors and other high-ranking academic nerds: get your students to design your websites, cause you always fuck it up. Lol.

  13. comment
    Comment #13861394

    I can't really think of any good forms of 'security through obscurity'. Is the elimination of buffer overflow vulns and sql injections a form of obscurity? Is SSL a form of obscuri…

  14. comment
    Comment #13860718

    How does it make the system easier to game? > Or that could be another downside if the answer is "the moderators". To me it seems like an upside if we know when moderators are gami…

  15. comment
    Comment #13860139

    > There's simply too much data that isn't public. Make it public?

  16. comment
    Comment #13860131

    > There's no way around the need for moderator intervention on a site like HN—the clue is in the word 'moderator' itself: left to its own devices the system runs to extremes and it…

  17. comment
    Comment #13775800

    > What do you do with a conscript who never wanted to be there and possibly fundamentally isn't suited to military life anyway gives up? Threaten them with legal action? In some co…

  18. comment
    Comment #13767214

    Static typing is great. My point is that whether a language is statically or dynamically typed has no bearing on whether it is functional.

  19. comment
    Comment #13766715

    Type-checking doesn't really have any bearing on weather a language is functional. Functional languages can be statically or dynamically typed.

  20. comment
    Comment #13753845

    Wait, so you say 'that is patently ridiculous', then completely agree with me while trying to add your own little spin on it? Okay bud.

  21. comment
    Comment #13748399

    ^ That's called ideology.

  22. comment
    Comment #13748379

    He`s not talking about policy. Most capitalistic businesses are anti-competitive regardless of policy.

  23. comment
    Comment #13713873

    You still don't get it buddy.

  24. comment
    Comment #13708619

    > I don't think he has a problem with government spending as long as it's towards corporations instead of people. That's exactly what every right-libertarian and ancap thinks and a…

  25. comment
    Comment #13708421

    You don't get it. Calling them 'liberal premises' makes you look like a dumbass.