Viewing profile — mkagenius
mkagenius
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jan 01, 2014, 6:06 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 3,335
- Public activity
- 1,339 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mkagenius
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49219610
10k steps is a lot for me too.
-
comment
Comment #49219108
> continued using Artifactory for their sandbox This is still fine. Infact, they had gone one step ahead by having an internal cluster of artifactory rather public managers like pi…
- story
-
comment
Comment #49178734
> NixOS is the key to all of this, since agents can interact see the whole server config We added native support for nixos for the same reason - malleability and debugging becomes …
- comment
- story
-
comment
Comment #49160913
I love how goal posts are shifting from "vibe coded apps dont really work" to "vide coded projects wont be maintained"
-
comment
Comment #49158942
Couldn't find what exact tests they are running. The GitHub repo is very obscure to be read by my human brain.
-
comment
Comment #49158759
If you ever need to switch sandboxes, would be happy to chat.
-
comment
Comment #49148086
There is also a microvm.nix project which helped us support sandboxes with firecracker. So, whole ai workflow pipeline can now be nixos.
-
comment
Comment #49130761
You can close your eyes. Tricky if it's noisy - but then that's an issue in itself.
-
comment
Comment #49100737
I also just finished writing a note - https://mkagenius.substack.com/p/notes-on-mythos-breaking-ae... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49099977
- story
-
comment
Comment #49092989
If you are a pentester who uses mitmproxy you can check out security skills distilled from 4000 Hackerone public disclosures https://GitHub.com/instavm/security-skills
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #49035293
> Are you writing for an internet rando who’s got nothing better to do than to hunt for em dashes? Some people even take pride on being able to detect (often falsely) AI generated …
-
comment
Comment #49027143
One was IMO gold medal winner as well.
-
comment
Comment #49019249
Specific quirk of llms, also pretty much solved by existing thinking models. I think you guys are misunderstanding me, you can still talk to a llm to learn everything about physics…
-
comment
Comment #49018611
they are wrong on the specific nuance of my codebase too, i am talking about learning something - i can still learn everything about software engineering talking to a bot.
-
comment
Comment #49017712
They are solving jacobian conjectures, I don't think they will hallucinate till masters level of any subject. Edit: do give counter examples if you have any in maths, physics, chem…
-
comment
Comment #49017604
> I can't use it for theoretical physics because I can't evaluate the responses. I think pretty much the opposite. I can ask it to explain to me in ways I understand it. Even drill…
-
comment
Comment #48999046
It's also unclear what kind of sandboxing they are referring to. Is it the codex one - coz that one has built-in ways to circumvent guardrails, for example by "just asking user" an…
-
comment
Comment #48975918
You might want recheck your theory - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970377
-
comment
Comment #48972416
What I meant to say there is, all the bloats are going away as we speak, is the bun rewrite a bloat? A slop? why would you call it one if it's not. What if we used AI in a way that…