Viewing profile — mjl-
mjl-
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Aug 09, 2009, 11:44 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 355
- Public activity
- 102 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mjl-
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #44604512
What I'm wondering: Are the salaries high? Not just because you've been employed at the job for a long time with regular raises, but because it's hard to find developers.
-
comment
Comment #44105674
Congrats on the release! Having calendaring (and address book) along with your email makes it easy to run your own self-hosted PIM infrastructure.
-
comment
Comment #44006582
Using tls client auth certificates for submission would make slightly more sense indeed. But who would request LE certificates to install them on desktops/phones of individuals? Th…
-
comment
Comment #44006123
Most SMTP traffic is encrypted nowadays, at least "opportunistically", without verification. Only with MTA-STS enabled for the server will an SMTP client (that's delivering to an S…
-
comment
Comment #43538067
> I started writing a guide to IMAP back when I was working on an email client I would be very interested in hearing from developers about how they write email clients that need to…
-
comment
Comment #43537257
> Any sane client will instead use UIDs for everything Yes! Since last year there's the experimental UIDONLY extension that allows clients & servers to operate entirely without mes…
-
comment
Comment #43537072
> You can send lots of requests to a server and you have to tag them so you can match them up with responses later Yes, you can match the final OK/NO/BAD responses with the origina…
-
comment
Comment #43265469
Most of mox is written with acme (also some vim)!
-
comment
Comment #43265208
> multiple separate components Btw, I don't think it's better to have separate _components_ as in separate software packages. Integrating this functionality into one software packa…
-
comment
Comment #43265185
Yes, you can add domains, add accounts (which contain the mailboxes and messages), and configure addresses for the domains with accounts. So one account can have many addresses, at…
-
comment
Comment #43265017
> because the updates and security fixes are managed by Debian. Once things are configured, I don't need to do anything using unattended upgrades This is a good point. It would be …
-
comment
Comment #43264978
> (which may already exist) - I'd love to be able to use my external spamassassin with it instead of (or even in addition to) the built in one This isn't possible yet. For me, the …
-
comment
Comment #43264933
> incoming emails didn't work from Microsoft but they fixed that in 0.13 Yeah, this one was interesting. It looks like microsoft updated their TLS stack to TLS 1.3, but incorrectly…
-
comment
Comment #43264388
No, that won't work. The webmail uses a simple custom protocol. Perhaps someone can rewrite it using JMAP in the future...
-
comment
Comment #43264339
> this allows those spam checks which will still work to benefit from the normal delivery path. It's not exactly the same. When a backup MX has accepted the message, it takes respo…
-
comment
Comment #43264279
> I didn't find anything about sub-addressing in the features list. Is it a supported feature? Yes, assuming you mean addresses like user+ @domain. The "+" is configured by default…
-
comment
Comment #43264028
From a security perspective, it is better to have separate & isolated processes (but written in modern languages that provide safety). Mox is currently a single process handling al…
-
comment
Comment #43263865
Hi Bron! Thanks, JMAP will come at some point too! (: Someone has already been working on JMAP support in mox. I'm currently in a refactor of the storage layer, keeping history of …
-
comment
Comment #43263845
The looks match the intended audience. (: I'm focusing on functionality/protocol support now. User/admin-friendliness and making it more attractive will come later. Mox will become…
-
comment
Comment #43263832
Seems reasonable. I have been thinking about schemes for backup mx'es. When the primary is online, the backup would just forward the smtp connections to the primary directly. The b…
-
comment
Comment #43263791
I'm hoping to make this easier in the future, more often automatically taking care of updates. In the past, you've had to run a command/script here or there to fix up date, but tha…
-
comment
Comment #43263765
> Does mox support antivirus addition No, not currently possible. I think it needs milter-like functionality in the smtp server. Would be good to have eventually.
-
comment
Comment #43263737
There is some more information about spam filtering at the features page: https://www.xmox.nl/features/#hdr-junk-filtering I'm very happy with how the filtering works for me. Most …
-
comment
Comment #43263674
1. no 2fa in the webmail yet. work is currently underway at the ietf for standardizing chained SASL (auth) mechanisms, and passkeys. i want to look at implementing passkeys already…
-
comment
Comment #43173350
I browsed through the article, but it's not clear to me if they're only encrypting data at rest (that you open up with a login session, but then: their referenced docs mention alic…