Viewing profile — mjewkes
mjewkes
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jul 27, 2012, 4:38 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 138
- Public activity
- 79 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mjewkes
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48113681
>an awful lot of modern professional life consists of producing artifacts whose primary audience is other people producing artifacts. Slide decks for slide decks, strategy document…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #43558885
Sure, they can build it here—but protectionism doesn’t deliver long-term success. In the short term, it drives up prices and makes consumers poorer. In the long run, tariffs shield…
-
comment
Comment #43065756
How do you get 55%? Wikipedia says 49.8%. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidentia...
- comment
-
comment
Comment #42012671
CAR-T may have a ~50% cure rate for blood cancers: https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/141/19/2307/494672...
-
comment
Comment #41941865
I agree completely with the first part. But SWA-1380 was a commercial operating fatality in 2018. Not a crash into terrain, but the engine definitely crashed into the fuselage.
-
comment
Comment #41875929
Centrifugal forces on the spinning object will tear it apart once it goes “really fast”
-
comment
Comment #40598169
The FDA approves new modalities that do things “in their own way” all of the time! Yescarta, Kymriah, the mRNA vaccines, the approved VHH, scVF and “mimetics” in the article. Here’…
-
comment
Comment #40593595
>I can say this with pretty strong confidence: had the FDA not being so strict about its trials, lots of these experimental type of antibodies would have already received massived …
-
comment
Comment #40567109
If you are truly netflix-to-be, you should be able to affordably incentivize your 12 key employees with equity. An exit for Employee < 50 at a netflix-to be will be in the hundreds…
-
comment
Comment #40201605
Apples are better than bananas. Cherries are worse than apples. Are cherries better than bananas? -- GPT-4 - wrong gpt2-chatbot - wrong Claude 3 Opus - correct
-
comment
Comment #40017554
Notably, if you ask it to transform the statements to formal logic, you get a correct response! This stuff is truly magic. https://chat.openai.com/share/81e45fef-a72b-4258-98d6-5c8…
-
comment
Comment #40017517
For sure. It's not a fair prompt at all. I'm super bullish on LLMs and am using GPT-4 in production right now. This stuff is magic. It's actually hard to find short, simple, "plain…
-
comment
Comment #40016369
My current favorite “LLM breaker” below. GPT4, Claude, and this all fail. —- Apples are better than bananas. Cherries are worse than apples. Are cherries better than bananas?
-
comment
Comment #37696842
Editorial write-up: https://archive.ph/0T2XI
- story
-
comment
Comment #35941691
Worth checking out the talk page. Looks like this whole article is out of date and that much of the problem is resolved.
-
comment
Comment #34306299
This seems credible: https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/EDBK_288015
-
comment
Comment #34306240
As fabiancook mentions, credible sources all end up on pubmed within a year or two of publication, so it's an excellent resource. That said, Pubmed is an aggregator, not a curator.…
-
comment
Comment #31553128
https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9412.html and The Great American Drug Deal, by Peter Kolchinsky. Specific claims: - The US pays more for new drugs than the rest of the …
-
comment
Comment #31553124
No assumptions. The rand article addresses that directly.
-
comment
Comment #31551607
Hey biorach - I would suggest: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9412.html and The Great American Drug Deal, by Peter Kolchinsky. Specific claims: - The US pays more for …
-
comment
Comment #31551572
The claim is largely true for drug development, but not for routine procedures. Those are expensive for unrelated, and largely pathological, reasons. I would suggest: https://www.r…
-
comment
Comment #31551563
The claim is largely true for drug development, but not for routine procedures. Those are expensive for unrelated, and largely pathological, reasons.