Viewing profile — mitteldorf
mitteldorf
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Dec 10, 2014, 10:59 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 7
- Public activity
- 12 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mitteldorf
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #8843416
I agree - take a look at http://www.amnat.org/an/newpapers/SepMitteldorf.html http://mathforum.org/~josh/Mitteldorf&Martins_Programmed-Agi...
-
comment
Comment #8843409
Marginal effect on INDIVIDUAL fitness, but a huge effect on THE FITNESS OF ECOSYSTEMS. Without aging, ecosystems would be unstable dynamic systems, and would not last more than a s…
-
comment
Comment #8843404
This way of thinking assumes that all life is evolved for maximum reproductive fitness. This is false. It is bedrock evolutionary biology, but it is also false. It turns out that t…
-
comment
Comment #8843390
The tradeoff between reproduction and aging is sometimes present and sometimes absent. The successes are over-reported and the failures under-reported, so you might get the impress…
-
comment
Comment #8843379
The most important thing to keep in mind is that your own body is your best experimental lab, and that you should pay attention to what works FOR YOU and keep a diary. Other people…
-
comment
Comment #8734366
The Selfish Gene was a phase in our understanding of evolution. The mainstream now agrees that evolution is a whole lot more complicated than that. It's still true that "group sele…
-
comment
Comment #8734351
There is no "natural selection" within an individual body, within an individual lifetime. Yes, there are some cells that continue to live and others that continue to die. But the c…
-
comment
Comment #8734336
Tragedy of the Commons is exactly right. Yes, the genes spread through the gene pool, but then the population goes extinct very quickly because there's a huge population and nothin…
-
comment
Comment #8734328
Take a look at the works of Mikhail Blagosklonny. His view of aging and hormesis is just what you describe. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3249451/ (I'm not endorsing …
-
comment
Comment #8729233
Thank you for the correction. I was relying on my memory rather than looking up the chemistry. I regret that I'll have to remove the reference to the US atrocities in Vietnam, but …
-
comment
Comment #8729210
Yes, it is group selection, and group selection has been badly maligned for almost 50 years now. But a large body of literature confirms group selection. See David Wilson's book, U…
-
comment
Comment #8728626
Yes, thank you. Breast and thyroid cancer studies on Hiroshima survivors show HIGHER rates. This was a blunder on my part. I've removed the paragraph on Hiroshima.