Viewing profile — mitmatt
mitmatt
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Oct 04, 2010, 3:48 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 82
- Public activity
- 21 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mitmatt
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #28650270
The first statement may be referring to the Cramer-Rao bound: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cram%C3%A9r%E2%80%93Rao_bound But it only applies to estimation (like how well a populat…
-
comment
Comment #7347037
Corporations are taxed in the US: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_tax_in_the_United_St...
-
comment
Comment #6576812
Just speaking in terms of "quantum size" (and not computing power, which is not understood yet), it depends on the graph of possible entanglements among the qubits. If it were a co…
-
comment
Comment #6576763
It wasn't really shown to be faster; see http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=1400 . To focus on the "3600 times" issue, I suggest searching for the strings " Ising" and "CPLEX". D…
-
comment
Comment #6576718
It's not able to do full quantum annealing; it's only able to use stoquastic Hamiltonians on a fixed topology. Even if truly quantum effects were present (which is unclear at the m…
-
comment
Comment #6338434
To clarify, there are public-key cryptosystems with no known quantum attacks, but it's not known how to build such systems based on problems that are known to be QMA-complete (or N…
-
comment
Comment #6227293
Try piping into psub, as in paste (hquery -q '//a/@href' x | psub) (hquery -q '//a' x | psub) http://ridiculousfish.com/shell/user_doc/html/commands.html#...
-
comment
Comment #6131568
What have I said that suggests "MIT is not to blame for very much at all"? My comments have dealt with factual issues; I don't see where I advanced any opinions on MIT's deserved l…
-
comment
Comment #6131240
If by "objected to FOIA requests" you mean "filed a motion, just like JSTOR, proposing the ability review and suggest redactions to the requested documents over a window of five da…
-
comment
Comment #6130717
From http://swartz-report.mit.edu/docs/report-to-the-president.pd... , Appendix 14, Question 35: > 35. What influence, if any, did MIT exercise or could it have exercised in the pl…
-
comment
Comment #6127696
> The report appears to find that MIT should not have changed its neutral stance, which is disappointing, and I'm skeptical. The report does not have any findings about what MIT "s…
-
comment
Comment #5962204
The USC group has a response to Smolin and Smith which explains how some quantitative features are still best explained by a simulated quantum annealer: http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.5…
-
comment
Comment #5886327
That computation is probably something you were already familiar with in disguise: it's just the law of cosines [1][2] along with the fact that a matrix of inner products can be co…
-
comment
Comment #4661288
I just ran Wes's benchmarks (not the BLAS call versions) on my machine with a Julia I built on 10/13 (17c3c13), and the timings have indeed improved. For the details, see this gist…
-
comment
Comment #3480797
They actually point out a specific comparison to FFTW in the paper: their "preliminary implementation" is faster than FFTW for n=2^22 and k I don't know how to estimate what values…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #2633100
Lee Smolin argues pretty concretely and convincingly that the anthropic principle cannot be science because it cannot yield falsifiable predictions: http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/040…
-
comment
Comment #2616319
It was debunked by some of the top minds in the world (e.g. Terry Tao), though the author's webpage states that it's under journal review. Here's the "official" debunking summary o…
-
comment
Comment #1888888
For the record, the iPad is $499/$599 for 16/32 GB (WiFi) models, not $599/$699 as you stated: www.apple.com/ipad http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/shop_ipad/family/ipad?...
-
comment
Comment #1756117
Those are a lot of great links! But I disagree with your "BTW" line: I don't think factor graphs are more popular than Bayes nets (a.k.a. directed graphical models), at least not i…
-
comment
Comment #1756070
Just so you know, the Latent Dirichlet Allocation is very much a Bayesian model, as it says in the original paper's abstract [1] (first google hit). (LDA is a bit of an overloaded …