Viewing profile — miningape
miningape
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jul 07, 2022, 8:41 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 710
- Public activity
- 406 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About miningape
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49226946
Go for it, if you need suggestions just ask
-
comment
Comment #49216536
> if you step out of this forum and the culture you are in, you will be offended every day You're not alone, there's just a weird culture in the West at the moment of signalling em…
-
comment
Comment #49154713
Very much similar experience to yourself, when I was learning from YouTube tutorials I refused to copy/paste from their repos and instead typed everything out. Maybe changing varia…
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #49109391
Yeah I highly doubt that claim, if it were true, buddy would be getting a massive signing bonus from OpenAI/Anthropic + endless press noise about it
-
comment
Comment #48919587
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #48444114
Not GP but honestly I don't even spend 10% of my time writing code - even if these tools were perfect code generators that could read my mind (instead of having to prompt) it would…
-
comment
Comment #48307912
They should be running pre-mortems every morning at this point
-
comment
Comment #48266908
inb4 "EvERyTHing Is PolItiKz"
-
comment
Comment #48062509
Nah don't worry, I'm sure Cyril will setup a commission for this
-
comment
Comment #47947590
> See what players think about the latest World of Warcraft patch. It's absolutely shit and broken Crazy to me that the loot tables are still broken for some players/characters, th…
-
comment
Comment #47812140
I prefer the old name, it was much more memorable because it's funny. "Yeah I'm playing with my Coq to try and get it working again"
-
comment
Comment #47791493
This is probably the most insane take I've read all year. As though an LLMs don't have an increased chance to bork code when they have to write it multiple times for different plat…
-
comment
Comment #47790810
A while loop, some prompts basically amounting to "this is how you format a system call" and "make no mistakes", there's also a regex + executor for detecting and executing system …
-
comment
Comment #47777825
Look at the JWT standard, it usually contains things like claims, roles, user ids, etc.
-
comment
Comment #47763541
If a consultant made the same mistakes I'd expect the consultant to be held accountable, not the client business that hired the consultancy - they knew they didn't have the requisi…
-
comment
Comment #47718283
> Wanna get back to hunting for that metal song? Absolutely flawless save chat
-
comment
Comment #47654713
Well, I have something to tell you about the last decade+ of EU immigration policy
-
comment
Comment #47595477
This is my take too - LLMs aren't an excuse to lower our standards, they're the reason to raise them. Put simply LLMs perform better on better code.
-
comment
Comment #47595164
I think what matters more than the abstract class vs if statement dichotomy, is how well something maps the problem domain/data structures and flows. Sure maybe its fast to write t…
-
comment
Comment #47584681
Seems to have been removed, I'm getting a 404
-
comment
Comment #47454450
No need to make it easier though
-
comment
Comment #47411209
At that point you lose all potential gains from just using AI - it's harder and slower to read and understand a bunch of verbose slop and then clean it up
-
comment
Comment #47335461
Not OP but I hold myself to that standard, and the honest answer is that at best it's the same.