Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — mingqiz

mingqiz

HN member
Joined
Tue, Jan 28, 2025, 7:31 AM UTC
HN karma
3
Public activity
8 items

About mingqiz

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49078509

    Makes sense. Let the rest of the world use open weight models and let us government review both closed models and open models, and only allow us citizen and American companies use …

  2. comment
    Comment #48981066

    Not true. Enterprise pay for api. If i am allowed to use fable withouta budget, i can spend 3k per day. Using combination of cheaper models (and better at least in my experience) c…

  3. comment
    Comment #48860028

    This. Claude is very good at instruction and treat my mistake in prompt as law. Gpt is just smarter at understanding my intent.

  4. comment
    Comment #48859878

    It's the other way actually. Cc is a better harness but gpt models are just so much better in my personal experience (at least for backend) ever since 5.4.

  5. comment
    Comment #48616571

    I honestly trust code reviewed by llms multiple rounds more than human reviewed code. Here is the thing. I don't know the human who wrote the code but i am familiar with the model …

  6. comment
    Comment #48592078

    But Claude especially copy opensource ideas after they are widely used for months

  7. comment
    Comment #48543858

    Isn't that what they are doing already? The model is already guarded and hidden and i only get to send it what i want. Talk with it to clarify my requirements. And i can switch to …

  8. comment
    Comment #48239883

    Deepseek dropped their price permanently.Now v4 pro costs 3.48% of the output token price of opus 4.7. (now that opus 4.7 has a more costly tokenizer). Is it fair to say that Anthr…