Viewing profile — mingqiz
mingqiz
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jan 28, 2025, 7:31 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 3
- Public activity
- 8 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mingqiz
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49078509
Makes sense. Let the rest of the world use open weight models and let us government review both closed models and open models, and only allow us citizen and American companies use …
-
comment
Comment #48981066
Not true. Enterprise pay for api. If i am allowed to use fable withouta budget, i can spend 3k per day. Using combination of cheaper models (and better at least in my experience) c…
-
comment
Comment #48860028
This. Claude is very good at instruction and treat my mistake in prompt as law. Gpt is just smarter at understanding my intent.
-
comment
Comment #48859878
It's the other way actually. Cc is a better harness but gpt models are just so much better in my personal experience (at least for backend) ever since 5.4.
-
comment
Comment #48616571
I honestly trust code reviewed by llms multiple rounds more than human reviewed code. Here is the thing. I don't know the human who wrote the code but i am familiar with the model …
-
comment
Comment #48592078
But Claude especially copy opensource ideas after they are widely used for months
-
comment
Comment #48543858
Isn't that what they are doing already? The model is already guarded and hidden and i only get to send it what i want. Talk with it to clarify my requirements. And i can switch to …
-
comment
Comment #48239883
Deepseek dropped their price permanently.Now v4 pro costs 3.48% of the output token price of opus 4.7. (now that opus 4.7 has a more costly tokenizer). Is it fair to say that Anthr…