Viewing profile — mindover
mindover
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jan 02, 2023, 4:03 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 37
- Public activity
- 47 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mindover
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #34349656
Don’t count where? If a person looks like they are from a warmer region and speaks Portuguese - unless they object - they will be classified as a PoC by most people in the US. Mayb…
-
comment
Comment #34349620
There is way more to race classification than the government classification. Talking to people, selecting the right choice in a questionnaire, applying for a job - no one is verify…
-
comment
Comment #34348377
I disagree. This is just a different relationship with work - not better and not worse. Being focused on career advancements doesn’t make them (sorry for generalizing again) worse …
-
comment
Comment #34348028
I know I am not in a position to complain (I am a “white” European) but I would be furious if I was so often grouped into a completely arbitrary race/ethnicity/skin color/country o…
-
comment
Comment #34347968
How is it describing it though? What does a white-looking immigrant Brazilian of European ancestry have in common with a Native American? How does labeling both as PoC address any …
-
comment
Comment #34347202
It’s ok to question any hiring discrimination and share personal observations about group behavior. However I agree with you that some of the comments are close to being derogatory…
-
comment
Comment #34347129
There is no group culture fit at tech companies. It’s always a company culture fit, ie “groupless” in theory.
-
comment
Comment #34347066
In my experience many Indians are very career oriented (mean that with no criticism). Ie they focus on promotions, career advancements, power consolidation, and not as much on work…
-
comment
Comment #34346738
Never noticed that in tech. I guess flattery is not very common in this industry in general.
-
comment
Comment #34346711
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #34346648
Agreed. The dream is for everyone to have a medal and cake. Even for disadvantaged while people in the US, who are not “colonizers” or some lucky “white privilege” beneficiaries.
-
comment
Comment #34344250
It sounds more and more like in the US (and, perhaps, in Canada too) people are being divided into essentially 2 categories: white and non-white. But to complicate things, people w…
-
comment
Comment #34343080
Interesting, looks like some sexual orientations fall into the “underrepresented community” definition. I wonder how the gauge this type of diversity. Would it be “sufficient” if h…
-
comment
Comment #34342938
Why are you conflating interpersonal racism with systemic? Both exist. If a white person is racist towards a black person do you call that racial bias? If you do, you are just repl…
-
comment
Comment #34342889
Racism by default means interpersonal racism. That’s why when we talk about systemic racism we add this qualifier. There might not be systemic anti-white racism in the US but there…
-
comment
Comment #34342807
Out of interest, are you still considered a person of color in the US?
-
comment
Comment #34341528
Technically there are more options, I agree. Practically very often these options are divided into whites (includes Asians) and people of color (includes Latinos but blacks have pr…
-
comment
Comment #34341311
Huh I didn’t know that! So does it mean that websites internationalize even the salutations? Do they replace “Hi Joe” with “Good day Mr. Brown” in Germany?
-
comment
Comment #34341263
My understanding is that asking the sexual orientation question is illegal at least in some states. Personally never been asked that by any employer in CA.
-
comment
Comment #34341234
If they know your race they can limit the amount of racism allocated to you by the company /s
-
comment
Comment #34341191
Most of the time in the US race means skin color. Which is somewhat ironic for a society so attached to Martin Luther King’s Jr. values.
-
comment
Comment #34341053
Seems like you are equating open source to free. No reason to do that - you can have a monetized open source product.
-
comment
Comment #34329528
So what age were the French talking about? It’s absolutely hilarious that you justify 13 year olds being able to give consent today while posturing about some French petitions from…
-
comment
Comment #34326573
Yes, at that time men under the age of 21 were considered children not being able to give consent specifically to having gay sex. However, men of the same age were not considered c…
-
comment
Comment #34319016
Amazing! Love heavy CSS experiments