Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — mikejb

mikejb

HN member
Joined
Mon, Jul 04, 2016, 5:28 AM UTC
HN karma
1,249
Public activity
343 items

About mikejb

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #30174922

    This is from from November 2021, but I'm still highlighting it because it is just terrifying (Correct time, though the video later on also exhibits inabilities of the system): http…

  2. comment
    Comment #30174873

    I think it's not just that. When Tesla started to with their FSD journey, they had to determine what sensors they can add to the car. Lidars back then were way more expensive than …

  3. comment
    Comment #29836408

    Another country that comes to mind is India - but I've never been enough of a Bollywood fan to be able to make any assessment on this topic. But it's a very effective tool to shape…

  4. comment
    Comment #28392237

    As much as it would be a solution to Tesla's problem, it would impact Tesla's overall plan and strategy. Automatically disengaging when emergency vehicles are detected is a huge ba…

  5. comment
    Comment #27511410

    > I'm not seeing this with the current situation It's what Waymo's is currently doing. So far, you only can get automated Taxis (in some regions) - you cannot buy an automated vehi…

  6. comment
    Comment #27503439

    I think this also translates to self-driving cars. I actually think automated cars have an edge there, because of 2 reasons: 1. Improved visibility: A human driver sits in the driv…

  7. comment
    Comment #27503160

    I think you're confusing a Tesla with a self-driving car.

  8. comment
    Comment #27503125

    Ok, I think we're having 2 separate conversations: a) What's the impact of self-driving cars at what point of distribution and b) What's the distribution of self-driving cars going…

  9. comment
    Comment #27500438

    Auotmated drivers don't make the human driver safer - they (should) make traffic safer by reducing the number of human drivers that would cause accidents. I don't think we're there…

  10. comment
    Comment #27500162

    I think Lvl3 is one of the most dangerous levels a car can be at, based on the experience Waymo (back then Chauffeur) made: Humans are even worse at monitoring than they are at dri…

  11. comment
    Comment #27500108

    To be fair: Self-driving cars that can drive safer than some drivers already exist. Simply due to the nature how unsafe some humans drive. (Some of these drivers are elderly, some …

  12. comment
    Comment #27500082

    I have my doubts about V2V and I2V communications. They'd simplify the task for automated systems, but come with a rat tail of problems. I2V is incredibly hard to scale, and is a d…

  13. comment
    Comment #25902375

    That particular attack had been fixed, but I remember people disabling those warnings with oranges: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYZrehVQouc It's an arms race between Tesla bein…

  14. comment
    Comment #25902325

    > you always have plenty of warning before you need to take over This only has to be false once. I'd also like to highlight that sometimes AP has frightening regressions. One case …

  15. comment
    Comment #25901877

    Right, because who would digitalize the entire world and take pictures of every house and store front - that'd be insane!

  16. comment
    Comment #25901848

    This is a curious point: How much data does Tesla actually collect? I can imagine users not being too happy if their car clogs the upload for hours every time you park it in your g…

  17. comment
    Comment #25901834

    To be fair, Waymo (back then Chauffeur) have solid experience with Tesla's approach. They started with the same strategy of gradual improvements. They found out (and shard) the sam…

  18. comment
    Comment #25901758

    Whilst Lidar and cameras may have similar wavelengths, they have very different information outputs. Cameras give you a 2D colored image from which you essentially guesstimate the …

  19. comment
    Comment #25849009

    Your 'experience' explains a lot about your opinion. Have a good day, stay safe.

  20. comment
    Comment #25845895

    So you say you suspect they have an ongoing investigation, and that would be "circumstances where every half competent organization would decline comment" What substantiates this c…

  21. comment
    Comment #25845146

    > And even if the ethical obligations were identical, Gebru’s violation toward Google wouldn’t excuse Google’s toward Mitchell. What about Mitchell's violation towards Google?

  22. comment
    Comment #25844246

    Just to get this straight: The researcher who tweeted out the name of an employee who's email has been blocked, and throwing out theories about crackdowns and firings - that's all …

  23. comment
    Comment #25844170

    > The normal response (for a variety of good reasons, including legal and ethical ones) from a company on a matter like this when asked by the press when they haven’t completed an …

  24. comment
    Comment #25844046

    The researcher who's departure sparked a lot of controversy tweeted the name of the employee in question, with some opinion attached. Axios reached out to Google who then made the …

  25. comment
    Comment #25844014

    Not every leak is a whistleblow. It depends on the content of the files. That verdict still needs to be made (depending on the content of the leaked files).