Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — mike10010100

mike10010100

HN member
Joined
Tue, Sep 27, 2016, 2:22 PM UTC
HN karma
89
Public activity
93 items

About mike10010100

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #20205267

    > This is an accusation made by the US government, it's not a fact. Are you claiming the chat logs that show Assange offering assistance cracking passwords are fake?

  2. comment
    Comment #20116413

    This. When is Apple getting on board?

  3. comment
    Comment #20116404

    > An iPhone is not a hard disk, but a computer with its own operating system, and you need dedicated software to communicate with it, imagine that. Lol so I guess my Android phone …

  4. comment
    Comment #20116376

    Lol "I don't want to use Apple's services for everyhing"...."Just use Apple's services!"

  5. comment
    Comment #20116354

    > You can disable iMessage at any point and it works. Maybe now, but there was a time when iMessage would continue to hijack your number and divert messages from your phone, even i…

  6. comment
    Comment #19756904

    > If the American people knew the truth about these military incursions, they would be utterly outraged The many, many, many times things have leaked with absolutely no major publi…

  7. comment
    Comment #19691520

    > And this is why the world is perpetually at war. No, that's because we have an entire industrial complex surrounding making war profitable. We had state secrets far before then a…

  8. comment
    Comment #19668491

    > you have to prove intent The intent is proven from the in which Assange agrees to provide assistance cracking a password. That is the textbook definition of "conspiracy to commit…

  9. comment
    Comment #19668426

    It seems like your only justification here is outright denial. That's an interesting tactic for someone who claims to care about the law and logic. Have you read a lot of indictmen…

  10. comment
    Comment #19668398

    These people are actively muddying the waters by making outlandish claims about what constitutes public and private property.

  11. comment
    Comment #19668396

    > If the govt is using the law to retaliate against journalists Assange is not a journalist. He conspired to hack a computer system. That is a crime. Regardless of what you believe…

  12. comment
    Comment #19668312

    It's like these people don't understand how these charges work.

  13. comment
    Comment #19668099

    > How would you elect someone to get that done when every issue is tied to a hundred other issues in the same candidate and basically none of them will have any meaningful progress…

  14. comment
    Comment #19668094

    You know, this was really quite the disproportionate reply that in no way answered the poster's question, but I have to say that this line takes the cake. > You'd rather the countr…

  15. comment
    Comment #19557331

    > I said very little was said Really? Because from the citations I've given, it looks like a lot was said. > That clearly isn't the case because it's happened already and journalis…

  16. comment
    Comment #19557309

    It really isn't.

  17. comment
    Comment #19523963

    Then perhaps if you could be a little clearer about what you are saying, we could have a discussion about that.

  18. comment
    Comment #19521689

    Blocking access to information via DNS blocks is an entirely different concept than private entities not wishing to host extremist content on their private platforms.

  19. comment
    Comment #19521672

    > PC Mag is mainstream media, now? How many readers do you think it has compared to a national newspaper? You're comparing apples to oranges. What's it's ranking among tech/PC webs…

  20. comment
    Comment #19521483

    This seems like a relatively moderate view, and I like how it breaks down the individual freedom of intentioned users vs. the freedom of users who have no intention of seeing said …

  21. comment
    Comment #19521436

    ISPs as a group blocking IP-level access to portions of the web is far and above a different thing than a private company or a group of private companies refusing to host content o…

  22. comment
    Comment #19521321

    > His channel is not 'deleted', (as is the case with the majority of right-wing commentators as well btw), but it is very much 'shadowbanned'/blacklisted, (economic ruin). And, as …

  23. comment
    Comment #19515224

    > you are acting ignorant when you know there are only handful of platforms on internet. Your continued participation in said platforms ensures that they will remain the "only" pla…

  24. comment
    Comment #19515091

    > just out of interest... such as? Enjoy! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQF2-F-GG_o And here he is with a bunch of others! https://i.imgur.com/SXqc8PX.jpg > You could be really h…

  25. comment
    Comment #19515040

    > The same Voat that just got banned in New Zealand for hosting stuff the government didn't approve of whilst Facebook, which also hosted it, was left alone? Take it up with New Ze…