Viewing profile — mikaelj

Let your type 2 go untreated and continue living your crappy life, and you'll develop type 1 as well. By exhausting your pancreas. But yeah. Crappy article title.

As long as I can have multiple clients working on the same set of files, I don't care how it's implemented. :-)

I do depend on a completion plugin, other than that it might just work. I'll have a look at it - thanks for the suggestion! Did not know it existed.

No, Vim can only have one buffer active at any given time.

Close, but not enough. I want to open the same editor session spread across multiple windows on multiple monitors.

Hope someone (not me!) starts working on a nvimclient (akin to emacsclient) soon.

As always, for all these small languages (MicroPython comes to mind, but even "real-world" languages such as Lua) - unless they grow a debugger, they'll always be silly toy languag…

...and now off to re-build the British Empire...?

Terrible choice in name.

Couldn't your FTP server have handled this in a clever way? For example, sort in directories by first letter, then by first two letters. While still providing a virtual flat view t…

If we were to name your operator "aif" instead (since there is no "when" in Python), and compare if and aif: ## if val = func() if val: # standard form code(val) # of if ## aif aif…

What sort of websites?

I did not ask a question - I wanted the poll to clarify what architectural changes were to be made in order for the minimap feature to exist. :-)

I don't follow - it is /not/ clear to me which underlying API it is that will get implemented by voting for "sublime-style mini-map".

The refactorings thus far have been specifically aimed at making Neovim work better for /developers/. Which in turn will make it better for the users. A very good way of thinking.

"Sublime minimap" and "better autocomplete" are features that use an underlying API. I'd prefer if they could be renamed to "Fetaure X which enables e.g. sublime minimap" and dito …

What is the standard you're talking about? Common Lisp? Scheme? Clojure? Emacs Lisp? Common Lisp, of course. That's what you refer to when you say Lisp today. Otherwise you'd say S…

Why the non-tsandard names of everything? And... CLOS?

Yet lots of time to comment on HackerNews... ;-)

No, it's not quite apparent at all, and no, a few Google searches did not yield any useful information. (I do however like the high horse you're on, very nice breed indeed.) I call…

Apple shared? Get with the program: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KHTML

You seriously underestimate the development time it takes to pull off such a thing.

Uhm. What's wrong with ISO/IEC 16262 ECMAScript?

In a mono-culture you have no predators thus no evolution.

Are you implying Presto is multi-threaded?