Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — micvbang

micvbang

HN member
Joined
Mon, Aug 09, 2021, 8:03 AM UTC
HN karma
81
Public activity
37 items

About micvbang

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. story
  2. story
    Ask HN: How to get portfolio exposure to RISC-V?

    I believe RISC-V hardware is going to well in the coming decade. I've been trying to figure out what I can invest in to get exposed to it, but have been unable to find anything wit…

  3. comment
    Comment #44415339

    Thanks a lot for telling me!

  4. comment
    Comment #44415264

    Yep! And direnv on top of that :)

  5. story
  6. comment
    Comment #44020161

    I got tired of the pricing and/or complexity of running message queues/event brokers, so decided to play around with implementing my own. It utilizes S3 as the source of truth, whi…

  7. comment
    Comment #43615202

    Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman! by Richard Feynman

  8. story
  9. story
  10. story
  11. story
  12. comment
    Comment #40885825

    I've had many use cases for using an event broker, but never found one that was simple enough that I would venture into hosting it myself, or cheap enough to rent/host that it was …

  13. story
  14. comment
    Comment #40710200

    I've been on teams where we've done this (very successfully in my opinion!) by creating helper code that automates creating a separate Postgres schema for each test, running all mi…

  15. story
  16. comment
    Comment #40521059

    Hadn't heard of this - it looks very interesting. Thanks for the reference!

  17. comment
    Comment #40513015

    Cool - thanks for explaining!

  18. comment
    Comment #40512617

    Yeah, it's currently a one-process-army so consensus isn't a problem :D With the current implementation you /could/ run multiple readers at the same time; the only state there is, …

  19. comment
    Comment #40512592

    Thanks, great question! My strategy was to start out by implementing the underlying storage primitives first, and then look into which transport to implement later. The transport o…

  20. comment
    Comment #40512516

    OP here. I hadn't seen this before, but I'll definitely give it a look. Thanks!

  21. comment
    Comment #40512511

    Hehe, I'm very sorry, but there must be some kind of cultural barrier here. My smiley was intended as a way to intentionally show OP that I wasn't trying to be mean or anything, bu…

  22. comment
    Comment #40512476

    Thanks @eatonphil for posting this! OP here: I'd love to (try to) answer any questions you might have :)

  23. comment
    Comment #40512066

    What isn't working for you? :)

  24. comment
    Comment #37448542

    You're right!

  25. comment
    Comment #37448535

    Thank you. Yes, I agree that it's a good idea to look for companies that create divided systems based on RISC-V. It's primarily these I've had trouble to identify :)