Viewing profile — micrio

The default viewer does have that. Rijksmuseum's website where this is implemented chose to disable it.

A follow-up on this one. Now textures are downloaded by WebWorkers using the transferable buffers. Over multiple benchmark runs this results in another 32% CPU performance gain (We…

Thank you for your points! As I said in the article about the benchmarking-- I definitely did it the "quick and dirty" way, testing the whole application 2.9 vs 3.0 on just my devi…

I have to admit that I didn't dive 100% into what made this difference exactly. It just worked better without webworkers. I just dived into the git history, and it turns out I didn…

I wholeheartedly agree with this. V8 is definitely incredible impressive and keeps improving. However Micrio uses a lot of low level Matrix4 maths, which is substantially faster in…

Yeah, I still encounter IE10 and older sometimes -- looking at the wide audiences Micrio projects are used for, this ranges from grandparent's Windows XP machines to OS-locked gove…

Thank you very much! Really interesting question. Whereas I don't have power-specific benchmarks, the general rule of thumb for power consumption is indeed the amount of CPU + GPU …

Thank you! Someone else in this post asked the same question and I answered briefly there. Indeed the engine rewrite itself from general purpose to specific usage probably made the…

Thanks for the comment! I agree that the change to a custom tailored engine probably made the biggest difference performance wise. At the end of the article I also briefly mention …

Launched using this JS platform. Using custom markers, tours, camera controls. All done very greatly, much respect to the content people.

Thanks for your reply, you're right about that. Currently we've only been developing micr.io based on wishes we received, that includes features such as hotspots, tours, etc. See h…

Ofcourse the huge volume is great, it's awesome! But by only offering single high-res .jpg files instead of image tilesets just makes the viewing experience less than pleasant.. Do…

It's really a shame that it simply gives you the original files, not allowing very high res images (ie greater than 10.000 x 10.000). We built a tool for this that's being used by …

Yeah, I've heard that more. I guess I still have to optimize that (the demo part of it is cool, the scrolljacking isn't). Thanks for your feedback, I appreciate it.