Viewing profile — michael_nielsen
michael_nielsen
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jul 24, 2007, 5:10 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 8,027
- Public activity
- 755 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About michael_nielsen
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47524583
Thank you for sharing. And I'm very sorry for your loss.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #46612406
A few comments have been kind enough to recommend the textbook I wrote with Ike Chuang. I'm glad they find it useful! It's worth noting: the book assumes a fair bit of mathematical…
-
comment
Comment #45737538
Timothy Chow has a wonderful phrase for this - he describes one of his papers (on forcing) as solving an "open expository problem": https://timothychow.net/forcing.pdf
-
comment
Comment #43955480
Agreed, & flagged the submission. The actual article is of interest, but I really don't want to reward inflammatory titles.
-
comment
Comment #43826784
I've been wondering at what point AI assistants are going to reduce that to a manageable level? It's unfortunately not obvious what the main bottlenecks are, though Chris and Shan …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #42255770
I see virtually no politics. Maybe don't follow accounts which post about politics?
-
comment
Comment #41071448
A good brief overview here from Tim Gowers (a Fields Medallist, who participated in the effort), explaining and contextualizing some of the main caveats: https://x.com/wtgowers/sta…
-
comment
Comment #41040895
You have not understood the statement.
-
comment
Comment #41040862
Just so you know: you've completely misunderstood the statement.
-
comment
Comment #40870556
There's (at least) two meanings for AI: (1) Software systems based on extensions of the LLM paradigm; and (2) Software systems capable of all human cognitive tasks, and then some. …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #40374350
There goes 50+% of my use. "LLMs are no good for [use case X]" often means "I aren't very good at using LLMs for [use case X]". With many powerful tools - violins, say, or carpentr…
-
comment
Comment #40328551
It was the records of $100 billion dollars in retirement assets that was deleted by Google. Not a small deal, and far more than many small banks. I am, unfortunately, a customer of…
-
comment
Comment #39419872
Stoll has written a lovely 2010 mea culpa, originally a (now-vanished) comment at: http://boingboing.net/2010/02/26/curmudgeony-essay-on.html , I saved the comment. Quoting: "Of my…
-
comment
Comment #39297082
I flagged this - it seems too clearly flame bait. If it was an honest mistake, my apologies. Disney had three movies in 2023 which took more than $200 million at the US box office
-
comment
Comment #39212987
I mostly agree with this. Certainly the last line! I've been reflecting on Jeremy's comments, though, and agree on many things with him. It's unfortunately hard to tease apart the …
-
comment
Comment #39212003
I'm not sure why they're so often so bad. I wonder if it's the Upton Sinclair effect; to paraphrase slightly: "It is difficult to get a person to understand something, when their h…
-
comment
Comment #39032137
So are the rules of the road.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #38918981
We have extremely detailed and well-tested models of climate. It's worth reading the IPCC report - it's extremely interesting, and quite accessible. I was somewhat skeptical of cli…
- story
-
comment
Comment #38749624
I co-authored that book (written in the late 1990s). I don't know when quantum computing will happen - I only follow developments very, very loosely now - but think you're being mu…
-
comment
Comment #38749531
Quantum computers won't search unordered databases with fewer than ~ sqrt(N) queries. Proved in: https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9701001