Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — michael9423

michael9423

HN member
Joined
Sun, Feb 25, 2024, 4:43 PM UTC
HN karma
302
Public activity
83 items

About michael9423

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
  2. comment
    Comment #47719650

    That’s a great idea. Have you compared the effects of your product with non-modified soluble fibers? Afaik, soluble fibers not only from oats but also from vegetables and beans alr…

  3. comment
  4. comment
  5. story
  6. comment
    Comment #42033231

    That does not make sense statistically. A decrease in total HFCS consumption would lead to a decrease in new diabetes cases if it was the actual root cause. Sugar is not the cause …

  7. comment
    Comment #41820596

    I don't think you can speak for all vegans and vegetarians. I was vegetarian for a couple years until meat cravings became so strong I started eating meat again. 84% of vegans and …

  8. comment
    Comment #41502576

    Wind turbines do not produce a lot of energy in total so you need a lot of them. Thousands of tons of concrete are poured into the soil for the foundation of one wind turbine, and …

  9. comment
    Comment #41502548

    The thing is that nuclear research has been stiffled for decades. It is possible to create nuclear reactors that consume their own waste.

  10. comment
    Comment #41491485

    This is considered 4th gen: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTR-PM

  11. comment
    Comment #41491362

    Here's the paper: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342671383_Metal_dis...

  12. comment
    Comment #41491345

    Yes, technically there is nothing that is 100% clean. But with nuclear and water, you more or less control the area of contamination and you don't have a permanent production of to…

  13. comment
    Comment #41490304

    In my previous comment elsewhere that got flagged, I said, among other things, that the only clean sources of energy are nuclear and water. Solar panels are generally pretty toxic …

  14. comment
    Comment #41487387

    [flagged]

  15. comment
    Comment #41333158

    How can he be sure he's a theoretical physicist if he doesn't know reality exists at all? The truth is, instead of reality, he would be better off questioning theoretical physics, …

  16. comment
    Comment #41322047

    Librewolf does #1 and #2 already. But generally, there's no market for that. Most of those who say "I would pay for that" would indeed never do it. Because those people want someth…

  17. comment
    Comment #41272762

    Brave does integrate uBO. It can be activated under "manifest v2 extensions" in the settings.

  18. comment
    Comment #41095986

    To clarify, my comment was directed at chatGPT itself, not your project.

  19. comment
    Comment #41095982

    I'm angry at ChatGPT and the like polluting the web, academia and people's minds.

  20. comment
    Comment #41094824

    It's not at all funny. It's dumb, and from the headline alone - "A dairy delight" - I already knew it was the lame and predictable ChatGPT language model with all it's repetitivene…

  21. comment
    Comment #40977907

    You know perfectly well that point 1 is completely irrelevant in the world of open-source. A UK Ltd. is less transparent than Librewolf, an open-source project run by many voluntee…

  22. comment
    Comment #40953955

    I think ads should not be allowed for anything at all in the digital world, including TV. In a world without ads, products would be known due to reputation. Ads are an assault on t…

  23. comment
    Comment #40920613

    > A single cow produces around 220 pounds of methane and around 200 pounds of ammonia per year. That's equivalent to 5ish gigatons of CO2, again per cow per year, so this really ma…

  24. comment
    Comment #40913467

    Near me is a conservation area where agriculture is not allowed, but cattle grazes there all year round. It is sold locally. Plant-based food is often farmed on an industrial scale…

  25. comment
    Comment #40698648

    Thank you for that paper. It shows that the proposed negative effects of CO2 do not exist. Let's take the study by Rodeheffer. Even 15,000 ppm CO2 in the atmosphere did not change …