Viewing profile — metaphysicalyes

> In the case at hand, however, there is no mistaken identity. No mistaken identity of no-name masked gunmen picking and killing random people in neighborhood. Clearly they must be…

You claim to have no information about the shots fired yet you assert "I suspect most never watched the video in detail or interpreted it with hindsight." This kind of asymmetric w…

Do you recognize the freedom and comforts you enjoy is due to the tiny brave and unhinged section of population willing to take actions against their self-interest? It is reasonabl…

> And also she did hit the officer She made contact with the officer. And that is only because he had to put down his recording phone and take out the gun instead of focussing on s…

> If anything, it indicts Gruber for wanting to bandwagon I am all for bandwagoning if it makes a dent in spread of fascism. I am all for bandwagoning behind keeping mothers alive.…

I have been curious about this as well. So far what I have discovered, for a significant section, it is schadenfreude borne out of their past injustice. It roughly translates to: n…

I hope you are not claiming perception of intent is enough to claim a life. It is the actual intent that counts. Appeal to mental ineptitude is not a defense of murder. If a person…

Very convenient because right around the moments of shooting the video goes blank and the viewer can confirm the below preconceived notions: 1. The masked gunman was in grave dange…

Would you support shooting the ICE driver who made vehicle contact with the protestors when trying to make way? Another scenario, imagine your family member pulling out her parked …

It is incomprehensible to me how the 2nd and 3rd shot from side window would not count as murder. A neighborhood isn't war zone where a sign of disobedience is a fair kill. Blasphe…

First shot is a red herring. It might be legal in the US to shoot the driver trying to hit you when are already out of the vehicle's way. The more condemnatory are the 2nd and 3rd …

The current administration has made clear that right or wrong is the question of which side has more power. And appeal to human morals has lost its power in dopamine addled society…

Lets assume you are right. How do you justify the 2nd and 3rd shot from the side window? Very curious how your mind works.