Viewing profile — meson2k
meson2k
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Sep 20, 2011, 5:15 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 63
- Public activity
- 12 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About meson2k
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #14737317
> Good luck guessing that address. Our own unikernel, IncludeOS, randomizes addresses at each build, so even with access to source code you still don’t know the memory layout. "The…
-
comment
Comment #13451395
Nokia sued Qualcomm back in the day when they were the biggest mobile manufacturer. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/24/technology/24qualcomm.html Look where they are now... Apple ne…
-
comment
Comment #10261601
The emitted code is highly name mangled - one of the reasons why you encapsulate the C code in "extern C" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_mangling
-
comment
Comment #10261554
or when memory constraints prevent you from using libstdc++
-
comment
Comment #10261513
The size increase by using these techniques would be far smaller than linking in libstdc++. libc is much smaller than libstdc++, especially when you need to support dynamic code an…
-
comment
Comment #8339133
Qualcomm MDM9625 is the powerhouse behind VoLTE and connectivity. This isn't the latest MDM from Qualcomm though...
-
comment
Comment #7299090
This is what their website says: " Dear MtGox Customers, In light of recent news reports and the potential repercussions on MtGox's operations and the market, a decision was taken …
-
comment
Comment #6723075
MSM6280 is 7 years old. The author has no clue how advanced these RTOS have become now and the kind of effort that goes into security at a system level e.g. xpu, smmu etc.
-
comment
Comment #5447921
Dunster, any clue if Quantopian supports option trading?
-
comment
Comment #5447914
Good try. Some observations: - The sharp ratio is very bad. Focus on improving. Instead of looking for spectacular gains, focus on solid growth. - Looking at the daily tick backtes…
-
comment
Comment #4085856
A zero-area polygon. A zero-volume hedron. etc. etc.
-
comment
Comment #3018501
"i" undeclared