Viewing profile — meowface

Everyone I know, including myself, is simultaneously extremely pro-AI and anti-AI for this reason. I always put myself in the shoes of the reader when relaying Claudeslop. I either…

They won't, because they can't. It's all just vague populist contrarianism.

No, because I do not work at an AI company. I am more just facepalming.

The Guardian's article and your reply here are so foolish and absurd that I can only imagine OpenAI employees are cringing but know they can't/shouldn't really say much.

It's just you. Fable 5 is consistently better than Opus 4.8 at literally every single level, for me. (I always use both at xhigh, for reference.) I could go down a laundry list of …

They arguably might be, but I kind of want them to be!

It's going to be pretty crazy when GPT-6 comes out, since the rumors are it's quite a bit smarter and wiser than GPT-5.6.

This would seem to lead to absurd implications. What if in, say, 20 years, an AI is able to independently prove nearly everything important in under an hour, including the Riemann …

Hilariously absurd cope. They're still not very good at writing, but you've flipped the takeaway. The correct conclusion is writing style isn't very relevant to intelligence.

Hot take: even GPT-3 was not a parrot. Skeptics have never properly internalized that the fundamental operation is basically irrelevant to the gestalt. Humans are not parrots yet n…

You can use that retroactive logic about any hard problem though. Unsolved murder cases, math, theoretical physics. If tons of smart humans try for years and fail and then an LLM t…

It's so soon that it may be rational to delay certain math and software projects until smarter models arrive

I don't know why you're saying this, given this is not sycophancy and instead is an actual example of Claude Fable finding a real counterexample. I would get it if the mathematicia…

The interesting thing about using Claude Fable 5 is it's nearly as irritatingly sycophantic as past Claudes while genuinely being smarter than the previous models. So you get a kin…

The tweeter, Levent Alpöge, is a professional mathematician who works at Anthropic.

No offense but that seems like a...not good use of money. For the $100/month or $200/month tier you'd get way more out of Claude Fable 5, which is definitely a better model than K3…

This could also apply to deferring to an inaccurate textbook or professor, though. We know people are going to defer. The solution here is to make AI (including the free tiers) mor…

Oh yeah, I've noticed the same, for sure. But that's basically what I was expecting. The best model is not necessarily always going to be the most cost-effective/sensible model for…

At this point I barely put any value in any of the benchmarks. I just use the models for coding (and related things like software product design/planning/ideation/etc.) tasks and j…

To summarize: the classifiers Anthropic puts in front of Fable are way, way too zealous and have way too many false positives. From my experience, the model itself is very useful w…

- I agree that trying to hamfist a poorly-engineered game-like rendering engine into Claude Code was not wise - hence my agreement in my initial post that "Claude Code is seemingly…

There are multiple levels to the irrelevance of your reply.