Viewing profile — melihelibol

[dead]

Yes, the ownership-based safety model and tight Rust integration, plus a pretty fleshed-out host-side tensor API for different workloads (sync, async, replayable CUDA graphs). Thou…

Burn's great, and we cite it in the paper's related work. Different layer, though: Burn is the high-level DL framework (tensor ops, autodiff, backends), whereas cuTile Rust is the …

cuTile Rust lowers through CUDA Tile IR, which is NVIDIA-specific, so any of those targets (ROCm, Vulkan, Metal, NPUs, OpenCL) would be a new compiler backend. The programming mode…

I think the answer's actually yes. I'll give the short rationale here, but it's a deep topic and I'd be happy to take it further. The hot loop you're describing is the whole reason…

Yes! That's exactly the spirit. The readable, single-binary, kernels-included codebase is a big part of what makes Grout fun, and the antirez parallel is accurate. There's a parall…

You got it right: This project exposes our tile programming model, whereas cuda-oxide exposes our lower level CUDA-like programming model. Our tile programming model is higher-leve…

Hello, I built cuTile Rust and just posted the paper preprint. Happy to answer questions. TL;DR: Rust gives you fearless concurrency on the CPU, but GPU kernel programming still re…