Viewing profile — meh2frdf
meh2frdf
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jun 21, 2015, 11:36 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 57
- Public activity
- 122 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About meh2frdf
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49268821
winnie the poo?
-
comment
Comment #49268786
The driving in Portugal is notoriously bad, yeah maybe not such a concern in your tourist experience in Lisbon center, because you can't really go fast. Get out on the motorways an…
-
comment
Comment #48803033
If the terms are unfair, then don't agree to them, that is a consumer choice, don't agree to agreements you disagree with!
-
comment
Comment #48801476
Should according to you, as it serves you best that way. Not how the world works, and for sound economic reasons.
-
comment
Comment #48801460
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_game_(philosophy)
-
comment
Comment #48801437
But the issue is those terms are laid out in the agreement, and you willingly agreed to those terms, so what are arguing for is to welch on the deal you accepted? In terms in consu…
-
comment
Comment #48801402
No not really. When you bought a VHS of a movie, you purchased the video cassette hardware, but also a license which was bundled with that object. That license explicitly had some …
-
comment
Comment #48801375
This I think is fair, consumers generally have a very poor understanding of licensing. Too many still think in the old days of buying physical goods, you 'buy' a tin of beans, they…
-
comment
Comment #48801345
Which is all detailed as something they can do in the licence you bought but obviously didn't understand (which is fine I don't read the details either). You seem to have semantics…
-
comment
Comment #48801328
You are 'buying' some thing, a licence that grant you some permissions (aka rights). That licence has some constraints, you don't like them, then don't buy the licence. It's litera…
-
comment
Comment #48801314
Yeah the OP doesn't understand licensing, seems to only think of purchase in terms of physical goods, and is trying to poorly apply their reasoning based on that.
-
comment
Comment #48586155
Just build a decent rdf database, with SPARQL, basic inferencing and SHACL support rather then reinventing another thing
-
comment
Comment #48501740
This might interest you then https://ont.fyi (shameless plug)!
-
comment
Comment #31527029
Unpopular opinion, but I think RDF and shacl solves a lot of this!
-
comment
Comment #31257399
I honestly don’t see it matters, it’s a nice option but being open data is totally optional.
-
comment
Comment #31257382
URIs a mostly namespaces, it has no bearing on being private data. If you know what your doing you’ll be using ontologies made by others, and like having a namespace for a library …
-
comment
Comment #29728710
Sounds like your in a good place, contentment is better than chasing a never ending comparison to others.
-
comment
Comment #29310861
The cyberneticians aren’t happy how cyber means infosec these days!
-
comment
Comment #29128551
Well it’s not as cold as it used to be for some reason ...
-
comment
Comment #29028091
Everyone is different, saying someone is x because y just shows he has lots to learn about life.
-
comment
Comment #28933127
I don’t think anyone talks about Fitbit anymore ...
-
comment
Comment #28896417
I think they are fixating too much on the vr aspect (ie the virtual model/graphics), I think the world you perceive via sight and sound being processed/mined and providing useful p…
-
comment
Comment #28582262
My prescription glasses are ray bans, I need a new pair and I’m quite tempted to get these. I like the built in headphones and I’m interested in being able to take pics of my kids …
-
comment
Comment #27720694
All music has copyrights, the title doesn’t make sense!
-
comment
Comment #26198844
failing start up looking for someone to pin their failures on, I’m guessing they got hacked in some trivial way ... I’d resolve it by giving the twat who is taking crap a slap ... …