Viewing profile — mecsred
mecsred
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Mar 31, 2022, 3:18 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 698
- Public activity
- 264 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mecsred
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48659935
The person being sentenced was not involved in any way based on this information.
-
comment
Comment #47091664
That would honestly be an incredible performance art piece, like a distilled waste of a human life just to prove a point. Then even after all that you could ask the question "Is th…
-
comment
Comment #46948762
Obviously people know, but theres no impulse to introspect on why or how. Knowing that someone else knows you had a hard braking event taps in to our social brains to provide a muc…
-
comment
Comment #46784982
In the current social climate I would absolutely not trust public media to understand general consensus. Ask specific people you trust or seek out their opinions.
-
comment
Comment #46572782
If the 16 performs worse in the power efficiency department, that is not great, but it doesnt make my machine run any worse. Calling it heavy is crazy to me, the thing is tiny. If …
-
comment
Comment #46567323
You mean the framework Ive been running for the past 4 years or so?
-
comment
Comment #46349442
why do you have to do what people on this website tell you? Write the fun thing.
-
comment
Comment #46046549
How do you plan on defending those rights if you dont vote.
-
comment
Comment #45891908
If you read first and write last isnt that the opposite of committing and then reading to see what is comitted?
-
comment
Comment #45648366
None of the shadows you can physically see in the photos have 0 area because the construction of the fractal isn't perfect. What a perfect construction would look like and if it's …
-
comment
Comment #45558320
It only worked on undirected graphs in 2023. This article is about the newest breakthrough that works on directed graphs as well.
-
comment
Comment #45252891
Belief is not binary and can change with new evidence. You may believe it is likely someone is innocent, but should still witness all the evidence to update your beliefs. In the ra…
-
comment
Comment #44788056
Considering they provided multiple references to exactly what they were talking about, what gave you issues? They're not talking about what you linked, and they are talking about w…
-
comment
Comment #44706853
If you read the whole thread, the first comment I replied to, that user said exactly that thing.
-
comment
Comment #44690321
No, an unnecessary hyperbole would be saying people should be outraged at any app that allows unverified communication.
-
comment
Comment #44686069
So all forms of communication then? What is the end goal here, present your driver's licence and submit your comment to a Truth Verification Panel to be approved for distribution?
-
comment
Comment #44671383
Its all anecdotal all the way down, so here's another grain of salt to add to the pile. (Calories in - calories out) is correct enough to be the single most reliable metric, and wi…
-
comment
Comment #44630831
Not likely without other contributing technologies. These devices just move heat from one side to the other, at the cost of producing more heat. So you still have to dissipate even…
-
comment
Comment #44370092
I like this litmus test generally, but I think it applies mostly to self aggrandizing behaviour. "Most people are dumber than a threshold I consider intelligent" kind of vibe. I do…
-
comment
Comment #44230546
Thank you Spock.
-
comment
Comment #44172901
I really don't think learning to rely on these tools for product review is a good idea. The web shows how much gravity the advertising industry has. As soon as the number of people…
-
comment
Comment #44024477
Everyone is an ideologue. What _is_ is too complicated to fit in a human brain, so we compress it. Thinking you're a free thinker is a type of ideology you can subscribe to.
-
comment
Comment #43837039
Right, my complaint is that it only works like jargon, where you are just giving something a context-specific nickname. As a word shortening scheme, it's terrible. A world where ma…
-
comment
Comment #43835941
_#_ has to be one of the worst word shortening schemes I've ever seen get widespread. It only works with a very small number of long-lived technologies, in which case they basicall…
-
comment
Comment #43424948
Nice work! I like that you put lots of examples in the readme for people to get an idea of the engine right away. It looks great and I hope you enjoyed building it!