Viewing profile — mdk754
mdk754
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Apr 23, 2015, 2:22 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 23
- Public activity
- 24 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mdk754
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- comment
-
comment
Comment #12037866
Let's get this merged!
-
comment
Comment #11816002
Your point stands, and obviously makes more sense. My curiosity was more in whether there were performance (or other) bottlenecks which made it technically infeasible.
-
comment
Comment #11814409
> We might not want to run our production database in Docker (perhaps we'll just use Amazon RDS for example), but we can spin up a clean MySQL database in no time as a Docker conta…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #11643377
One could argue it's more about the "thrills-per-minute" counts going up. I'm not saying I totally agree, but it is at least evident to me that movies from past decades spend a lit…
-
comment
Comment #11269073
Modbus is still very common in ECUs. I work for a telematics company and Modbus is probably our 2nd biggest bus protocol next to CAN(J1939).
- story
- comment
-
comment
Comment #10926812
Apologies if you're just linking that for reference, but this is a 2nd article in the series.
-
comment
Comment #10924276
I currently do this for the basics, and drop down to git at the shell for anything more complex than the one or two things GitHub's client does well. It's a decent trade off in my …
-
comment
Comment #10893812
My thinking was that expanding your underlying md RAID would be the same as replacing the initial disk ZFS sees with a bigger one, thus enabling easier expansion at the md level an…
-
comment
Comment #10891175
Do you know, can you use ZFS for the checksumming on top of md for RAID? This way you get the expandability of RAID with the checksumming and snapshots of ZFS.
-
comment
Comment #10779063
No no, just NoSQL. Even Santa has "Big Data" in the cloud.
-
comment
Comment #10553004
> I assume they transfer it to local storage first before signing it so that a potentially malicious storage device can't pull a switcheroo. In the article they mention it doesn't …
-
comment
Comment #10513866
I could be wrong and haven't explored the idea myself, but couldn't you accomplish this with something like ceph or scaleio and tmpfs/ramdisk for your block devices?
-
comment
Comment #10473709
My experience is the same, 90% of unsolicited calls I get are from the same area code and prefix, only the last 4 digits are new. I love how it makes it really easy for me to scree…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #10252512
Forgive me, it's Monday morning and I haven't yet had my coffee, but it sounds like you're describing a block-level copy between two drives, something which RAID0 is most definitel…
-
comment
Comment #10235587
Agreed. They are a shining example of what I look for in a commercial company building an open source product. Self-hosted, community edition with no fundamental deficiencies, hack…
-
comment
Comment #10222789
Do you know what kernel version you were running? Was this years ago, or more recently?
-
comment
Comment #10222076
Could we add a "(2013)" to the title? Also, can anyone speak to the current state of affairs with respect to ext4, xfs, and btrfs? I'd love to hear about the tooling and code quali…
-
comment
Comment #9510987
Metadata: if it's good enough for the NSA it should be good enough for you!
-
comment
Comment #9426930
I too have been using Copy for years. Let's not forget they have a working Linux client. Maybe things have changed since I last looked, but they were one of the few supporting Linu…