Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — mdk754

mdk754

HN member
Joined
Thu, Apr 23, 2015, 2:22 PM UTC
HN karma
23
Public activity
24 items

About mdk754

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
  2. comment
    Comment #12037866

    Let's get this merged!

  3. comment
    Comment #11816002

    Your point stands, and obviously makes more sense. My curiosity was more in whether there were performance (or other) bottlenecks which made it technically infeasible.

  4. comment
    Comment #11814409

    > We might not want to run our production database in Docker (perhaps we'll just use Amazon RDS for example), but we can spin up a clean MySQL database in no time as a Docker conta…

  5. comment
  6. comment
    Comment #11643377

    One could argue it's more about the "thrills-per-minute" counts going up. I'm not saying I totally agree, but it is at least evident to me that movies from past decades spend a lit…

  7. comment
    Comment #11269073

    Modbus is still very common in ECUs. I work for a telematics company and Modbus is probably our 2nd biggest bus protocol next to CAN(J1939).

  8. story
  9. comment
  10. comment
    Comment #10926812

    Apologies if you're just linking that for reference, but this is a 2nd article in the series.

  11. comment
    Comment #10924276

    I currently do this for the basics, and drop down to git at the shell for anything more complex than the one or two things GitHub's client does well. It's a decent trade off in my …

  12. comment
    Comment #10893812

    My thinking was that expanding your underlying md RAID would be the same as replacing the initial disk ZFS sees with a bigger one, thus enabling easier expansion at the md level an…

  13. comment
    Comment #10891175

    Do you know, can you use ZFS for the checksumming on top of md for RAID? This way you get the expandability of RAID with the checksumming and snapshots of ZFS.

  14. comment
    Comment #10779063

    No no, just NoSQL. Even Santa has "Big Data" in the cloud.

  15. comment
    Comment #10553004

    > I assume they transfer it to local storage first before signing it so that a potentially malicious storage device can't pull a switcheroo. In the article they mention it doesn't …

  16. comment
    Comment #10513866

    I could be wrong and haven't explored the idea myself, but couldn't you accomplish this with something like ceph or scaleio and tmpfs/ramdisk for your block devices?

  17. comment
    Comment #10473709

    My experience is the same, 90% of unsolicited calls I get are from the same area code and prefix, only the last 4 digits are new. I love how it makes it really easy for me to scree…

  18. comment
  19. comment
    Comment #10252512

    Forgive me, it's Monday morning and I haven't yet had my coffee, but it sounds like you're describing a block-level copy between two drives, something which RAID0 is most definitel…

  20. comment
    Comment #10235587

    Agreed. They are a shining example of what I look for in a commercial company building an open source product. Self-hosted, community edition with no fundamental deficiencies, hack…

  21. comment
    Comment #10222789

    Do you know what kernel version you were running? Was this years ago, or more recently?

  22. comment
    Comment #10222076

    Could we add a "(2013)" to the title? Also, can anyone speak to the current state of affairs with respect to ext4, xfs, and btrfs? I'd love to hear about the tooling and code quali…

  23. comment
    Comment #9510987

    Metadata: if it's good enough for the NSA it should be good enough for you!

  24. comment
    Comment #9426930

    I too have been using Copy for years. Let's not forget they have a working Linux client. Maybe things have changed since I last looked, but they were one of the few supporting Linu…