Viewing profile — mcnamaratw
mcnamaratw
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Mar 08, 2015, 7:12 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 350
- Public activity
- 338 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mcnamaratw
Envelope: Turn your engineering problem into an animated solution in one afternoon
Free demo: http://envelopemodeling.com/intro.html
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45636825
Of course there were analog 'computers' but vacuum tubes were also used to realize digital computers in the early days. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum-tube_computer
-
comment
Comment #44349242
Maybe we agree, maybe we disagree. You got specific works and authors? That would help a lot.
-
comment
Comment #44349097
Don’t be a d**k. Lots of literary fiction is perfectly readable for normal humans. Lots of what isn’t accessible is just not that enjoyable to anybody. I’m happy to debate … but on…
-
comment
Comment #44349027
“This is fundamental misunderstanding of literature” No it is not. It is a central and vital part of literature. Wound you like to have a friendly debate, each of us using quotatio…
-
comment
Comment #44348970
Great example. It is absolutely a matter of taste. Sadly noise music doesn’t support a lot of full-time jobs compared to writing songs more or less the way the Beatles did. Which w…
-
comment
Comment #44348924
Then why is Kurt Vonnegut still so popular?
-
comment
Comment #44348860
What is that stuff? Is Kurt Vonnegut that stuff? Folks, downvoting the comment above is literally destroying what you claim to support.
-
comment
Comment #44348670
Of course that’s punishing, though 75% may be closer than 90%. But I don’t buy it as the root cause. Where is the new Susanna Kaysen or Lionel Shriver or Laurie Moore or Barbara Ki…
-
comment
Comment #44348563
But that’s new. Until ca 1970-2000, people read literary fiction because it was high quality, much more than because it was unrelateable. O’Hara, Salinger, and Franzen were not wri…
-
comment
Comment #44348534
That’s the old standby argument, and it may be right. I can’t really read John Barth or George Saunders the way I can read Richard Russo or Lionel Shriver or Kurt Vonnegut or Micha…
-
comment
Comment #44090924
It’s really not accurate to say that a photon has no position at all. How would a photodiode work? You have to be careful with this stuff. https://physics.stackexchange.com/questio…
-
comment
Comment #44087170
Not all of that is true. Who played with the un-updated CD version?
-
comment
Comment #44083613
Sure. But inventing something better is not reinventing the wheel. Those are two completely different activities.
-
comment
Comment #44083562
I’m sorry but you’re mistaken. The wheel was invented thousands of years ago.
-
comment
Comment #44083553
Yeah. Ok. You want the fine print? Reinvent the wheel … for your own learning and fun. Or invent a different kind of wheel. Don’t reinvent the wheel on a tight deadline while the r…
-
comment
Comment #44067946
No, dB are always power gain.
-
comment
Comment #42567738
Kind of agree. But pervasive downvoting by folks who don’t understand the subject is a form of forum rot. The risk is only that we expose the rot. Not such a terrible risk, because…
-
comment
Comment #42566524
Dale Gribble
-
comment
Comment #42552754
The economic boom isn’t helping everyone.
-
comment
Comment #42367856
The book is from basically the “experimental music” school of electronic music. The idea was/is that music will be completely transmuted by electronics and computers, leaving tradi…
-
comment
Comment #42290768
Thanks. Agreed, that could have been a good point to mention that Laplace transforms are more or less the same as Heaviside’s method. As I read it, the article leaves the opposite …
-
comment
Comment #42290208
Great. Possibly missed the opportunity to point out that Heaviside’s method is more or less the same as Laplace transforms.
-
comment
Comment #41970106
Good point, your suppliers need to get singular too. And sales. And management or investors.
-
comment
Comment #41970058
Just on the naive math level, a simple growing exponential has no singularity at any finite time. I’m sure Vinge knows that but some of those dudes don’t seem to. EDIT Rest in peac…
-
comment
Comment #41827847
It’s cool that you’re a native speaker, but the typical HN commenter is at a much higher level of proficiency than that. Irony notice. This comment contains irony.