Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — mckilljoy

mckilljoy

HN member
Joined
Fri, Oct 10, 2008, 8:19 AM UTC
HN karma
233
Public activity
90 items

About mckilljoy

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. story
  2. story
  3. story
  4. comment
    Comment #11505029

    I just started reading this book, maybe half way through, it's very interesting! Some of the technical analogies are a little weak, but all the quotes and anecdotes are great.

  5. comment
    Comment #11484254

    Redex runs at compile time, not at install time.

  6. comment
    Comment #11483618

    25-30% is a pretty solid improvement.

  7. comment
    Comment #11389961

    I just skimmed through some of those Glassdoor reviews. They were all quite positive, but I find it interesting that the vast majority were posted Feb-Mar 2016.

  8. comment
    Comment #5869822

    Yea that's fair. I was actually thinking of timer coalescing on the server OS for improved power efficiency/performance -- I'm sure IIS, MSSQL, etc. all opt-in to coalescing respon…

  9. comment
    Comment #5869750

    As others are saying, Microsoft is a very large company with a great deal of variance in the quality and maturity of teams. I wouldn't consider this description representative. Azu…

  10. comment
    Comment #5865068

    That was my first thought too -- Windows has had timer coalescing since at least 2008, if not longer.

  11. comment
    Comment #5827393

    This looks like the kind of product that will do well in San Francisco -- SF is where the venn diagram of "dog owners" and "gadget owners" overlap.

  12. comment
    Comment #5801376

    At first I thought was going in a bad direction, but it actually ended up pretty cute. Basically they asked women if they thought they were beautiful, and if they said "Yes!" they …

  13. story
  14. comment
    Comment #5795496

    I like reading these analyses, although I'm afraid headlines like this oversimplify things and give off the wrong impression. There isn't anything inherently wrong with NUMA, it ju…

  15. story
  16. comment
    Comment #5676896

    I agree for this one integer, they obviously should have been using 64-bit. I just take issue with the implication that Blizzard is somehow at fault or unusual for (presumably) not…

  17. comment
    Comment #5676863

    At the time the original code was written, it wasn't possible for a 32-bit integer to overflow, which is presumably why they didn't use 64-bit. That possibility was only introduced…

  18. comment
    Comment #5676635

    A x64 CPU will take a single instruction to operate on a both a 64-bit and 32-bit integer, and the CPU registers are all 64-bit, so in that context you are right that it doesn't ma…

  19. comment
    Comment #5675610

    Depends on the situation. I assume this was probably a server side bug, since all the accounting would never be trusted to the client side. If you are writing highly-performant ser…

  20. comment
    Comment #5675493

    I don't find it that odd. 32-bit applications are still very common, if not the standard. Most processes don't need more than 4GB. More importantly, blindly increasing all of your …

  21. comment
    Comment #5648459

    I can say from personal experience that the customers are probably a bit of both. Engineers walk through looking for parts for their prototypes, and then once the prototypes are co…

  22. comment
    Comment #5635204

    Selling debt to buy back their stock looks like a pretty safe bet. Most of the debt is starting off below ~2.5% interest -- using that to buyback the stock paying ~3% dividends is …

  23. comment
    Comment #5628727

    I'd agree, most of these numbers are "fuzzy" and based on analyst estimates; I'd almost be more surprised if they DID perfectly add up to 100%. :-)

  24. comment
    Comment #5628536

    It seems pretty reasonable to me. If Msft makes $1 billion on 20% of the market, and Amzn makes $3.8 billion (high-end analyst estimate) with 71% of the market, the math roughly ma…

  25. comment
    Comment #5628500

    That looks pretty significant. Amazon Web Services are somewhere between $2 and $3.8 billion (depending on which analyst you believe), so Microsoft is potentially within striking d…