Viewing profile — mbwgh
mbwgh
HN member- Joined
- Mon, May 24, 2021, 8:17 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 385
- Public activity
- 92 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mbwgh
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #43944688
> I'm only a hobby programmer and the experience wasn't encouraging. I have come across elitist communities like on SO, also regarding C++. I was downvoted and told to intentionall…
-
comment
Comment #42765952
Thus forcing a subpar default on everybody intentionally.
-
comment
Comment #42761664
You are absolutely correct and I was an idiot without a proper understanding of premature abstraction or unnecessary complexity. If I were to start a new side-project using Haskell…
-
comment
Comment #42755697
> >> is an old name for > I once had a hard to track down bug in some code making use of conduit[0], which is introduced using examples like `main = runConduit $ (yield 1 >> yield …
-
comment
Comment #42755619
Not me, because I hate change!
-
comment
Comment #41497462
I am simplifying in saying that they outright block FF, but the site is broken with Enhanced Tracking Protection enabled [0], and has been for a while. They even mention FF in a de…
-
comment
Comment #41497379
Yes? And the submission leads to twitter, which blocks FF deliberately, so what's your point?
-
comment
Comment #41453836
+"Searching" +"Like" +"This" works for me. Whenever I try this with Google, I can't seem to get it to work though. According to [0], it is not an official search operator anymore. …
-
comment
Comment #40481936
I like the sentiment, but the article ignores that this approach may incur the price of adding complexity to the implementation. Depending on your architectural constraints, adding…
-
comment
Comment #40453356
Elon is it you?
-
comment
Comment #40426802
In Ousterhout's "A philosophy of software design", this aspect is described similarly via "deep classes", as opposed to "shallow classes".
-
comment
Comment #40154721
Is this different/better than using `instanceof`?
-
comment
Comment #40050641
Thanks. I believe with the additional null checks, this version is safer to use, too!
-
comment
Comment #40021258
It's likely dependent on the 'user archetype'. If you need to e.g. lookup things related to beginner-friendly programming languages, the search results for Google are strongly tain…
-
comment
Comment #39713009
I was going to say that, then I noticed people are arguing about the "number of 9s of availability". You guys have WHAT?
-
comment
Comment #39683340
If you haven't actually used GPT-5 yet, your assessment is irrelevant.
-
comment
Comment #39202910
My (uninformed and probably misguided) idea was that there was a host DNS service (responsible e.g. for resolving local domain names) which would cause Windows itself to trigger so…
-
comment
Comment #39202549
Even Firefox will in general not protect you I believe. I showed my mom how she can use 'web.whatsapp.com' to use Whatsapp more easily (in order to share screenshots or links with …
-
comment
Comment #39202490
While that is generally true, as others have already reported there is progress being made. Since a few days ago, I tried installing/running Elden Ring again, which did not work wh…
-
comment
Comment #38998705
I find it disappointing that the "coming up with a recurrence formula" part is always glanced over, which to me is very much the hard part.
-
comment
Comment #38817095
Yes, the exit code. See e.g. `:help cq` in vim. :q! and ZQ will yield exit code 0, which sometimes is not what you want if you want to ensure some task is properly aborted.
-
comment
Comment #38567254
Since there are a lot of "replies to the author" in here: The article is from 2020.
-
comment
Comment #38262659
Contrary to what this heading suggests, nothing has been "decided" here. This article is not only inaccurate, it is falsely misleading. The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice an…
-
comment
Comment #38187902
The idea is that if you need dependencies, you only need them present during compilation on the machine you develop on. You then compile a statically linked binary and copy this to…
-
comment
Comment #38132847
But this kind of statement is the unfortunate industry standard. A more honest thing to say would be to say "there is no way to prove that your personal information has been or may…