Viewing profile — mbowcut2
mbowcut2
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Feb 09, 2022, 11:53 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 217
- Public activity
- 72 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mbowcut2
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48692427
I made myself reason it out, and came up with the exact same intuition. You need a sequence of 2n moves (n down moves, n over moves), but the sequence is completely determined by w…
-
comment
Comment #48465780
Totally agree. Granting exemptions feels like trying to have their cake and eat it too. If regulations mean anything they need to be enforced so we can see the real downstream effe…
-
comment
Comment #47220074
Gotta hit that docker system prune -a
-
comment
Comment #47040087
Loved him in Secondhand Lions.
-
comment
Comment #46800201
If you thought we were getting bad bugs before, just wait until the 90% agent-coded PRs start landing. We're gonna have multiple crowdstrike-level blowups.
-
comment
Comment #46737963
It's an interesting concept, but I'm skeptical about how feasible this is. How much design/legwork/intervention will Seth actually contribute during the entire process? I'm thinkin…
-
comment
Comment #46627258
Wow, I didn't know about the "skills" feature, but with that as context isn't this attack strategy obvious? Running an unverified skill in Cowork is akin to running unverified code…
-
comment
Comment #46124029
It makes me wonder about the gaps in evaluating LLMs by benchmarks. There almost certainly is overfitting happening which could degrade other use cases. "In practice" evaluation is…
-
comment
Comment #45531443
Seems like the less sexy headline is just something about the sample size needed for LLM fact encoding That's honestly a more interesting angle to me: How many instances of data X …
-
comment
Comment #45215205
I'm not surprised. People really thought the models just kept getting better and better?
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #44827917
it looks like the 2nd and 3rd bar never got updated from the dummy data placeholders lol.
-
comment
Comment #44800161
It's not a new problem (for individuals), though perhaps at an unprecedented scale (so, maybe a new problem for civilization). I'm sure there were black smiths that felt they had l…
-
comment
Comment #44727010
I've had similar experiences with vanilla ChatGPT as a DM but I bet with clever prompt engineering and context window management you could solve or at least dramatically improve th…
-
comment
Comment #44713256
You can, and there has been some interesting work done with it. The technique is called LogitLens, and basically you pass intermediate embeddings through the LMHead to get logits c…
-
comment
Comment #44711582
The problem with embeddings is that they're basically inscrutable to anything but the model itself. It's true that they must encode the semantic meaning of the input sequence, but …
-
comment
Comment #44683244
LLMs are better at LaTeX than humans. ChatGPT often writes LaTeX responses.
-
comment
Comment #44505203
I think I agree with you. My only rebuttal would be it's this kind of thinking that's kept any leading players form trying other architectures in the first place. As far as I know,…
-
comment
Comment #44302881
I read this as "pirate space industry" and got real excited.
-
comment
Comment #44302853
It's interesting how I couldn't tell whether the rocket was 1m tall or 10m tall in this video. Turns out it's actually 6m tall per the link.
-
comment
Comment #44227159
Nah, I think they made it model agnostic, which is kinda smart.
-
comment
Comment #44042969
To a topologist, everything is topology.
-
comment
Comment #43908541
Pack it up boys, they finally made the killer app.
-
comment
Comment #43364838
I had a smart TV that gradually got slower and slower until it became basically useless. I figured it was just running out of RAM as apps got larger with updates over the years.