Viewing profile — maxlybbert
maxlybbert
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Aug 23, 2013, 10:03 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,785
- Public activity
- 1,021 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About maxlybbert
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49178077
I've seen plenty of restaurants with a disclaimer that they have (often unspecified) allergens in the kitchen, and even if the allergen isn't in the ingredient list, it's possible …
-
comment
Comment #49177175
When I make, say, meat loaf, at home, I know that I use ground beef, Panko, egg, onion, ketchup, vinegar, oregano, and garlic. If somebody asks whether there's ground beef, wheat, …
-
comment
Comment #49174893
I think so. Look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Year#Annunciation_Style : “Despite the unification of the Scottish and English royal crowns with the accession of King James V…
-
comment
Comment #49171157
This is an interesting detail to learn about history. However, like the article mentions near the end, the Gregorian calendar was adopted at different times in different countries.…
-
comment
Comment #49158122
I remember seeing advice, years ago, to let lettuce sit in a weak bleach solution before use. But I doubt that’s ever been followed by many people. Current advice (at least at home…
-
comment
Comment #48900219
I was actually thinking at a different level. When I drive on the freeway, any time a police car gets behind me and turns on its lights, I have to stop. If I don't stop, I can ulti…
-
comment
Comment #48894506
That’s a valid concern. Of course, the example chosen for the article didn’t involve anybody abusing their authority. It involved police doing what I’d expect them to do. But I’ll …
-
comment
Comment #48894478
Yes, it is true that police have powers that can be abused, and police have abused them. It’s also true that they have those powers because we’ve decided the alternative is worse. …
-
comment
Comment #48894415
Police drive around in patrol cars. They don’t call judges every time they look at other cars. There may be problems with this system, but adding drones hasn’t created a new loopho…
-
comment
Comment #48892993
I don’t understand the problem. Police saw something they thought was suspicious, took a closer look, and then decided there was nothing illegal happening. I don’t think there’s a …
-
comment
Comment #48892920
This is a very common position. But I’ve never understood the argument that police should have to do some amount of busywork for things to be fair. Warrants aren’t required so the …
-
comment
Comment #48892866
For the record, most states have publicity rights (with exceptions) so that publishing a photo may still require somebody’s permission. But the police don’t need a warrant to follo…
-
comment
Comment #48809652
The Supreme Court mentioned your question in 2012 in US v. Jones ( https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/565/400/ ), without giving an actual answer: “This Court has to date …
-
comment
Comment #48808493
I really hope this doesn’t turn into yet another case of judges looking at irrelevant facts when making decisions. The fourth amendment does not say “private conversations,” so whe…
-
comment
Comment #48635717
In 2012, Windows 8 stopped booting on computers without UEFI secure boot. Hardware companies weren’t enthusiastic, but they couldn’t ignore Microsoft’s demand. Microsoft published …
-
comment
Comment #48615592
It's definitely possible. And common, at least in some projects. The only real drawback is that sloppiness will lead to multiple slightly different nonstandard string types in the …
-
comment
Comment #48589604
You would think so. Strangely, even though warrants have to be specific, police are allowed to seize things they come across during the search, even if those things aren’t on the w…
-
comment
Comment #47446306
The US can be very creative about when its jurisdiction applies ( https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/94-166 ). Manuel Noriega and “el Chapo” Guzman were both convicted of crimes …
-
comment
Comment #47270402
Well, they made a big deal about saying that while they sold their software to the Defense Department, it wasn't actually being used to kill people. Except for well-known military …
-
comment
Comment #47270359
I'm sure it was meant as "kills the wrong people." People are always worried about getting rid of humans in decision-making. Not that humans are perfect, but because we worry that …
-
comment
Comment #47270318
It's easy to say "I will never let the Department of Defense use my search engine for evil!" Or "the more money they spend on me, the less they have for weapons!" ( https://en.wiki…
-
comment
Comment #47191392
You asked: "Yes, but it only has two senators. The 39.5 million people in California have the same Senatorial representation as the less than 600 thousand people in Wyoming. "In wh…
-
comment
Comment #47129265
Tampa Bay Buccaneers? Las Vegas Raiders? Do you think the LA Rams have that name to claim ancestry?
-
comment
Comment #47084057
If somebody has a really stupid proposal -- such as "make all 3D printers refuse to print guns" -- I don't see why I have any obligation to "compromise" with them. Or to talk with …
-
comment
Comment #47083966
It is, in fact, legal (but very expensive) to own a tank ( https://www.drivetanks.com/ , yes, that's a company, but a rich enough motivated person could fill out the same paperwork…