Viewing profile — maxidorius
maxidorius
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Apr 26, 2018, 7:20 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 102
- Public activity
- 41 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About maxidorius
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47396659
In their Privacy Policy [1], Section 8: > Office.EU is a service offered and operated by EUfforic Europe BV, registered with the Dutch chamber of commerce under registration number…
-
comment
Comment #45962829
I was merely making the distinction for those non-english natives people like me who tilted their head not getting it at first :D
-
comment
Comment #45962636
"fuite" is french which means to escape, to flee. Flight is only in context of planes or flying transportation. As for the sense of it, you're right, it's either do something, go a…
-
comment
Comment #41922497
I recently bought a Tuxedo InfinityBook Pro 15 [1] which has 2 USB-C ports with one being USB 4 (equivalent to Thunderbolt4), 3 USB-A, 1 Ethernet, 1 HDMI, 1 audio jack and 1 SD car…
-
comment
Comment #41326880
No rudeness taken, don't worry! TIL, I didn't know! Thanks!
-
comment
Comment #41321414
And then the customers will open support requests for code generated by an AI that misuse that very SDK. It doesn't look like OP's issue is with the code per say, only with the lac…
-
comment
Comment #39371046
And yet Thib, mentioned in the article, does say in an another comment that they are employed by Element but working for The Foundation, making it quite hard to know the difference…
-
comment
Comment #21092435
I can only be happy to see that the research we made and the documents [1] we produced some months back have lead to changes that improve privacy in Matrix. It is a huge win for ou…
-
comment
Comment #20623524
> "It's so commonly used exactly because it's a very simple one-size-fits-all approach". ICO says this [1] about choosing a lawful basis: "You must not adopt a one-size-fits-all ap…
-
comment
Comment #20564679
Thank you for your input. I am not worried about any traction we are getting. People do care even if you think nobody does. Per example: https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacyto…
-
comment
Comment #20559845
Feel free to post the same with your real account instead of a puppet one, then I'll be happy to reply to all your points. I'm serious enough to put my name out there and own up to…
-
comment
Comment #20531036
I guess then New Vector is actually our best sponsor: they always give us those very important things to write about, like a personal data breach that has a federation-wide scope. …
-
comment
Comment #20524671
Because our document could be collected and processed illegally under GDPR. That the operator makes the conscious choice to have their name listed on their own organisation's websi…
-
comment
Comment #20515464
Thank you for bringing our "failing out", which has an impact on the Personal Data leak itself, so I really hope people will look into it. As for "with the general matrix community…
- story
-
comment
Comment #20325064
Interesting that you tighten up privacy by adding more tracking to your main website with a cooking spanning sub-domains as well: https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix.org/commit/48…
-
comment
Comment #20321820
Allowing a user to make themselves discoverable is fine. The real question is why was "vector.im" used and not "matrix.org", or the user simply prompted? And why is that data query…
-
comment
Comment #20321755
(One of the author of the research doc that triggered this blog entry here) It's good to finally see a reply, and it's good to see you are addressing some of the issues we have hig…
-
comment
Comment #20198963
We have answered to your claims of "being alarmist", "disproportionate FUD" and that we did not forget to disclose we are working on a fork which is not hostile. https://gist.githu…
-
comment
Comment #20193630
The document has been updated from feedback received all over the community, including new identified leaks and possible data correlations. We encourage anyone who already read the…
-
comment
Comment #20187566
Or what about joining the room given on the research paper and actually participating in the discussion? We would love to have some proper interaction where we can exchange network…
-
comment
Comment #20187512
After talking with the other contributors of the doc, we decided on not going into further details. We acknowledge the need for reproducible investigation, but the document did not…
-
comment
Comment #20182459
I believe you are missing the point of the document. It is not so much where the leaks go, but that they happen when there is no consent or knowledge of the transfer. Example: for …
-
comment
Comment #20182148
Totally fair point, thank you for bringing it up. Given the numerous build types (source, pip, debian packages, etc), what would you suggest to do in this case? Give the git commit…
-
comment
Comment #20181877
To clarify: the paper does not claim a list with email addresses is made public or anything of the sort. Only that they can be queried without restriction or authentication. Once a…