Viewing profile — maxgraey
maxgraey
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Feb 14, 2019, 3:38 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 90
- Public activity
- 53 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About maxgraey
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #33803626
Ah shit, here we go again. I just link to my previous comment which quoted in WasmWeekly News https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32564105
-
comment
Comment #32595435
> If you don't do frontend stuff, you don't have to use WASM, you know? WebAssembly is excellent for: - Game's scripting engine (UE plugin example: https://www.reddit.com/r/unreale…
-
comment
Comment #32594978
TypeScript has completely different goals. It will always just be a semantic checker on top of JS and nothing more. This has been mentioned more than once: https://github.com/micro…
-
comment
Comment #32592808
The main advantage of using Binaryen directly bypassing LLVM is firstly very fast codegen and optimization (Binaryen architecture perfectly utilizes multithreading as opposed to LL…
-
comment
Comment #32592699
> It isn't designed for or suitable for large projects. Why? The compiler itself is written in AssemblyScript and is capable of bootstrapping. The AS code base is quite large. In a…
-
comment
Comment #32564105
old topic: https://github.com/WebAssembly/WASI/issues/401#issue-8177488... The problem with WASI is that it is a some kind of truncated copy of CloudABI and POSIX. With all the goo…
-
comment
Comment #32138685
The article is relatively old. But I have the most complaints about the performance measurements. The WebAssembly should be tested in a way that eliminates the interop time, which …
-
comment
Comment #30930207
> Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, all within the very recent history, plus countless more US-backed color revolutions - including the one in your very own country, which realistic…
-
comment
Comment #28255172
> And there's been talk of exposing the JS GC to wasm for a few years. Hopefully when that stuff lands, it'll get easier to marshal objects across the gap. You don't need a Wasm GC…
-
comment
Comment #27948565
Are you sure UTF-8 is the ideal format? After all, we have grapheme clusters that cannot be rendered as text units using UTF-8. Maybe UTF-8 is already obsolete and never took over …
-
comment
Comment #27947544
So basically even in UTF8 you can create malformed string. For example ðŸŒ. It miss one byte and may cause to problems in some editors / text viewers which doesn't handle or pre-ve…
-
comment
Comment #26812221
Yeah, WebAssembly have i64/u64 types as first class citizens unlike JavaScript which should emulate it or use BigInt which drastically slower than native 64-bit types. That's why c…
-
comment
Comment #26301415
latest benchmarks with wasm3, wasmer, wasmtime, wavm and etc: https://www.00f.net/2021/02/22/webassembly-runtimes-benchmar...
-
comment
Comment #26102939
That's true. But wasm also required some extra codegen and optimizations for i64 types for example (also simd and atomics). In addition, wasm will have more specific CFG optimizati…
-
comment
Comment #26100720
It's unnecessary with AssemblyScript due to AS is just subset of TypeScript and can transpile to ordinal idiomtic javascript. Also AS already uses binaryen under the hood and can p…
-
comment
Comment #25595040
Ruffle - A Flash Player emulator over WebAssembly: https://github.com/ruffle-rs/ruffle
-
comment
Comment #25594979
There site which aggregate prod use cases: https://madewithwebassembly.com/
-
comment
Comment #25499508
Here a great example of how SIMD brings WebAssembly closer to native speed: https://medium.com/@robaboukhalil/webassembly-and-simd-7a7da...
-
comment
Comment #25495151
WebAssembly still not reaching their full potential in browsers. For example: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=11085&q=comp... On Firefix and Safari we have the same…
-
comment
Comment #25481871
Yes, indeed. All points are valid. Opaque anyref (externref) or reference-types WebAssembly proposal not yet in all browsers, but after it interop will become much easier. At least…
-
comment
Comment #25481551
You're right WebAssembly hasn't provide seamless interop for compound objects. AS expose special utility called loader: https://www.assemblyscript.org/loader.html#usage There are a…
-
comment
Comment #25480666
This is a temporary limitation which mean you can't capture free vars from outer scope (except global scope). One of the main goal of AS is performance but closure elimination requ…
-
comment
Comment #25478367
Great dev story about using AssemblyScript in production: https://engineering.q42.nl/webassembly
-
comment
Comment #25478049
Not only syntax, but also standard library, ecosystem and etc. You could easily transpile AssemblyScript project to JavaScript via tsc if use portable glue code. From C it I guess …
-
comment
Comment #24625865
> I don't think AssemblyScript will be the answer for you, as the goals of that language seem to be entirely different from "fixing" old JS cruft. Apart from the i32, i64 stuff I g…