Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — maxgraey

maxgraey

HN member
Joined
Thu, Feb 14, 2019, 3:38 PM UTC
HN karma
90
Public activity
53 items

About maxgraey

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #33803626

    Ah shit, here we go again. I just link to my previous comment which quoted in WasmWeekly News https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32564105

  2. comment
    Comment #32595435

    > If you don't do frontend stuff, you don't have to use WASM, you know? WebAssembly is excellent for: - Game's scripting engine (UE plugin example: https://www.reddit.com/r/unreale…

  3. comment
    Comment #32594978

    TypeScript has completely different goals. It will always just be a semantic checker on top of JS and nothing more. This has been mentioned more than once: https://github.com/micro…

  4. comment
    Comment #32592808

    The main advantage of using Binaryen directly bypassing LLVM is firstly very fast codegen and optimization (Binaryen architecture perfectly utilizes multithreading as opposed to LL…

  5. comment
    Comment #32592699

    > It isn't designed for or suitable for large projects. Why? The compiler itself is written in AssemblyScript and is capable of bootstrapping. The AS code base is quite large. In a…

  6. comment
    Comment #32564105

    old topic: https://github.com/WebAssembly/WASI/issues/401#issue-8177488... The problem with WASI is that it is a some kind of truncated copy of CloudABI and POSIX. With all the goo…

  7. comment
    Comment #32138685

    The article is relatively old. But I have the most complaints about the performance measurements. The WebAssembly should be tested in a way that eliminates the interop time, which …

  8. comment
    Comment #30930207

    > Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, all within the very recent history, plus countless more US-backed color revolutions - including the one in your very own country, which realistic…

  9. comment
    Comment #28255172

    > And there's been talk of exposing the JS GC to wasm for a few years. Hopefully when that stuff lands, it'll get easier to marshal objects across the gap. You don't need a Wasm GC…

  10. comment
    Comment #27948565

    Are you sure UTF-8 is the ideal format? After all, we have grapheme clusters that cannot be rendered as text units using UTF-8. Maybe UTF-8 is already obsolete and never took over …

  11. comment
    Comment #27947544

    So basically even in UTF8 you can create malformed string. For example ðŸŒ. It miss one byte and may cause to problems in some editors / text viewers which doesn't handle or pre-ve…

  12. comment
    Comment #26812221

    Yeah, WebAssembly have i64/u64 types as first class citizens unlike JavaScript which should emulate it or use BigInt which drastically slower than native 64-bit types. That's why c…

  13. comment
    Comment #26301415

    latest benchmarks with wasm3, wasmer, wasmtime, wavm and etc: https://www.00f.net/2021/02/22/webassembly-runtimes-benchmar...

  14. comment
    Comment #26102939

    That's true. But wasm also required some extra codegen and optimizations for i64 types for example (also simd and atomics). In addition, wasm will have more specific CFG optimizati…

  15. comment
    Comment #26100720

    It's unnecessary with AssemblyScript due to AS is just subset of TypeScript and can transpile to ordinal idiomtic javascript. Also AS already uses binaryen under the hood and can p…

  16. comment
    Comment #25595040

    Ruffle - A Flash Player emulator over WebAssembly: https://github.com/ruffle-rs/ruffle

  17. comment
    Comment #25594979

    There site which aggregate prod use cases: https://madewithwebassembly.com/

  18. comment
    Comment #25499508

    Here a great example of how SIMD brings WebAssembly closer to native speed: https://medium.com/@robaboukhalil/webassembly-and-simd-7a7da...

  19. comment
    Comment #25495151

    WebAssembly still not reaching their full potential in browsers. For example: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=11085&q=comp... On Firefix and Safari we have the same…

  20. comment
    Comment #25481871

    Yes, indeed. All points are valid. Opaque anyref (externref) or reference-types WebAssembly proposal not yet in all browsers, but after it interop will become much easier. At least…

  21. comment
    Comment #25481551

    You're right WebAssembly hasn't provide seamless interop for compound objects. AS expose special utility called loader: https://www.assemblyscript.org/loader.html#usage There are a…

  22. comment
    Comment #25480666

    This is a temporary limitation which mean you can't capture free vars from outer scope (except global scope). One of the main goal of AS is performance but closure elimination requ…

  23. comment
    Comment #25478367

    Great dev story about using AssemblyScript in production: https://engineering.q42.nl/webassembly

  24. comment
    Comment #25478049

    Not only syntax, but also standard library, ecosystem and etc. You could easily transpile AssemblyScript project to JavaScript via tsc if use portable glue code. From C it I guess …

  25. comment
    Comment #24625865

    > I don't think AssemblyScript will be the answer for you, as the goals of that language seem to be entirely different from "fixing" old JS cruft. Apart from the i32, i64 stuff I g…