Viewing profile — maxdesiatov
maxdesiatov
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jan 09, 2016, 5:29 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 553
- Public activity
- 48 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About maxdesiatov
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #19882264
Why not?
- story
-
story
Swift and React Native (and Similar Libraries/Frameworks) Survey
Hi all! I'm researching the current state of iOS app development. The big disclaimer is that I'm not in any way claiming that any of the approaches to it is the best in every case,…
-
comment
Comment #19005377
Sorry, I'm not sure I understand this point. Why would I need a different license for this from scratch implementation? What if I want Apache 2.0 as well? Also, I'm convinced that …
-
comment
Comment #19003474
but what about reimplementing a compiler from scratch without reusing any of Apple's code? It wouldn't fall under a definition of Derivative Work under terms of Apache 2.0 then
-
comment
Comment #19003244
And also, "it protects Swift" in their context always means "it protects Apple's Swift" unfortunately
-
comment
Comment #19003206
Exactly this, thank you for summarizing this so well! I've tried to clarify this exact point at Swift Forums, but I haven't seen even a clarifying answer from anyone in the core te…
-
comment
Comment #19003025
Including from suits from Apple itself for using concepts of Swift elsewhere in projects that were developed from scratch, not forked from Apple's projects, right?
-
comment
Comment #19002561
From what we see, software patents have caused more harm than good, but would be great if there were enough concrete public examples listed somewhere that prove otherwise.
-
comment
Comment #19002041
ok, does it mean that if you implement only parts of the patent (say only a single feature) there's no infringement because then it doesn't "fit the language of the claims"? Also, …
-
comment
Comment #19001900
Could you please provide an example? From what specifically have any patents protected users of an open source product? I know plenty of examples when patents were used to harm the…
-
comment
Comment #19001517
Could you please elaborate on this? Is there any direct confirmation of this? There wasn't any single answer from anyone affiliated with the Swift core team on this specific point.…
-
comment
Comment #19000742
The biggest question here is whether this means they lose the patents when they sue something that's not covered by Derivative Works as defined in Apache 2.0? Looks like an impleme…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #18436797
The main reason for that is lack of hygienic macros in Swift. Currently you can use code generation tools like Sourcery and SwiftGen, but I expect 1st-class meta-programming suppor…
-
comment
Comment #18435838
Except that in Objective-C it's a runtime feature, which is by definition slower. Swift's Codable implementation is generated by the compiler or is hand-written with an obvious ben…