Viewing profile — mattbuilds
mattbuilds
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jan 02, 2018, 2:23 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 449
- Public activity
- 90 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mattbuilds
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48805062
In fact, I think a good heuristic is probably the opposite. The type of person who becomes that rich is probably more willing to scam than the average person.
-
comment
Comment #47596190
No one put words in your mouth, they asked you a question. You are the one who made the initial comparison to B2C apps, so it seems like a fair question to me. Your comment implies…
-
comment
Comment #47495486
Yea clearly. There is nothing in here at all even worth discussing.
-
comment
Comment #45563144
Got any evidence of this or is just vibes based?
-
comment
Comment #45093585
That’s a false equivalency, sorry that some of us think companies should actually be responsible for the things they produce.
-
comment
Comment #45007118
I’m not saying coding is easy, but when it comes to games it is the easy part. Lots of people can code, very few can make something actually fun. Knowing how to code (or how to use…
-
comment
Comment #45005903
I’m sorry but the difficult part of making games isn’t the coding, it is making something that is appealing and enjoyable to play. An LLM isn’t going to help with that at all. How …
-
comment
Comment #44934825
I personally don't dismiss or advocate for AI/LLMs, I just take what I actually see happening, which doesn't appear revolutionary to me. I've spent some time trying to integrate it…
-
comment
Comment #44508873
True but if you are building it for yourself then you will still have something useful in the end. Chances are that you also probably enjoyed or took satisfaction in the process of…
-
comment
Comment #44001778
Got any evidence on that or is it just “vibes”? I have my doubts that AI tools are helping good programmers much at all, forget about “running circles” around others.
-
comment
Comment #43803715
According to your logic, a CEO should attempt to destabilize and influence the government's responsibility so they can maximize shareholder value. And guess what, that is exactly w…
-
comment
Comment #43803049
That is not a moral obligation, it is in fact the opposite. It is a lie that people tell themselves and the world to allow themselves to make immoral decisions for their own benefi…
-
comment
Comment #42673204
Is it really the best approach though if we sink all this capital into it if it can never achieve AGI? It’s wildly expensive and if it doesn’t achieve all the lofty promises, it wi…
-
comment
Comment #40007484
Just to further your point, we are in a thread about Kubrick who did numerous book adaptations including Lolita, Dr. Strangelove, The Shining, and Clockwork Orange and this is just…
-
comment
Comment #39990252
It’s funny because in my many years of development I don’t think I’ve ever encounter a “mess of shell scripts” that was difficult to maintain. They were clear, did their job and if…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #39443682
The way I tend to look at it is to solve the problem you have. Don't start with a complicated architecture because "well once we scale, we will need it". That never works and it ju…
-
comment
Comment #37623604
I've had similar things in the past. What was the case for me, and maybe for you is that I was using the idea of "organizing" and "planning" to procrastinate doing actual work. I w…
-
comment
Comment #37545685
The reason is growth. A sysadmin will make sure the lights stay on and the place doesn’t burn down, but they aren’t creating a new revenue stream. And when all these companies need…
-
comment
Comment #37530766
Which is funny, because they aren’t very good at it.
-
comment
Comment #37490936
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #37305512
I mean he’s a mouthpiece for Thiel, not really that surprising. His livelihood depends on viewing the world in a very specific way.
-
comment
Comment #37090173
Perfectly said, that was the exact point I was trying to make. I've seen so many bad decisions made in the name of "future proofing". The the future comes and you are fighting thos…
-
comment
Comment #37089448
I really disagree with the pros listed on over-engineering, specifically "future-proofing" and "reusability". I doubt you can accurately predict the future and whatever assumptions…
-
comment
Comment #36988777
Obviously we can’t prove this, but my instincts are that we don’t do things with probabilistic decision paths. Not very scientific of me, but I just don’t buy that’s how we make de…